This is a very helpful form because it can help combine denominators of fractions! My teacher always scolded me (rightfully) for writing ba+dc=b+da+c, but Titu's Lemma allows me to write ba+dc≥b+da+c. TAKE THAT, TEACHER!
Check what you really know
If you can solve a contest problem with this idea, you know it well. If not, you know exactly what to review. These are real problems from the AMC 12, the national math competitions for middle and high school students, each with a worked solution on LIVE by Po-Shen Loh.
We're look at three useful inequalities in this part.
Cauchy Schwarz Inequality
For all real numbers x1,x2,...,xn and y1,y2,...,yn we have (x12+x22+...+xn2)(y12+y22+...+yn2)≥(x1y1+x2y2+...+xnyn)2, with equality if and only if either xi=0 for all i, or there exists a number i such that xiyi=t for all i=1,2,...,n.
This is probably a very well-known inequality and can be proved by Lagrange's Identity easily. This inequality also implies the next, less famous, but nevertheless more useful form (for me) of Cauchy Schwarz.
Titu's Lemma
For all real numbers x1,x2,...,xn and y1,y2,...,yn we have
This part will consists of applications of Cauchy Schwarz, Holder's and Titu Lemma on some problems.
Prove that for all positive real numbers a,b,c,
(a5−a2+3)(b5−b2+3)(c5−c2+3)≥(a+b+c)3.
Direct Holder unfortunately fails. However, we can use a trick to use Holder here. Note that x5−x2+3≥x3+2 is equivalent to (x−1)2(x+1)(x2+x+1)≥0, which is obviously true. Thus, we can now use Holder to find that (a3+1+1)(b3+1+1)(c3+1+1)≥(a+b+c)3. This proves the inequality.
We continue with another problem, this time it's a proposal of me to Proofathon for the inequalities contest (that's over).
Suppose a,b,c are positive reals such that ab(a+b)+bc(b+c)+ca(c+a)+2abc=1. Prove that a3(a+b)2+b3(b+c)2+c3(c+a)2≥6(a2b+b2c+c2a)3.
Note that the equality is equivalent to (a+b)(b+c)(c+a)=1.
Multiplying similar inequalities gives cyc∏(a5+b3c2+2ac4)≥8(a2b+b2c+c2a)9, since (a+b)(b+c)(c+a)=1.
Thus, cyc∑(a3(a+b)2)=cyc∑(a5+b3c2+2ac4)≥33cyc∏(a5+b3c2+2ac4)≥6(a2b+b2c+c2a)3. (where the first inequality follows by AM-GM while the second follows by what we did above.
This proves the inequality.
Regrouping the terms then applying Holder is also a common technique.
You might be tired of Holder's Inequality already. Let's get on with one sweet application of Titu's Lemma.
Let a,b,c be positive real numbers with ab+bc+ca=31. Show that
a2−bc+1a+b2−ca+1b+c2−ab+1c≥a+b+c1.
By Titu's Lemma,
a2−bc+1a+b2−ca+1b+c2−ab+1c=a3−abc+aa2+b3−abc+bb2+c3−abc+cc2≥(a3+b3+c3)+(a+b+c)−3abc(a+b+c)2=(a+b+c)(a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca+1)(a+b+c)2=a2+b2+c2−ab−bc−ca+3(ab+bc+ca)a+b+c=a+b+c1, as desired.
An important trick to remember is to multiply both the numerator and the denominator by some term so that Titu's Lemma can be applied.
Finally, we end with a classical problem on Cauchy Schwarz.
(Iran 1998) Prove that if x,y,z are positive reals such that x1+y1+z1=2, then x−1+y−1+z−1≤x+y+z.
We have by Cauchy Schwarz,
(x+y+z)(xx−1+yy−1+zz−1)≥x−1+y−1+z−1
Since xx−1+yy−1+zz−1=3−x1+y1+z1=1, we're done.