Interactive · 9 questions

Resistors

So-called "ohmic conductors" are circuit elements (components) that have a constant resistance, even as the current through it varies. We usually simply refer to this idealisation as a "resistor", which is characterised by its single-valued resistance R≡VI.R \equiv \frac{V}{I}. Here VV refers to the potential difference across and II the current through the component. Recall that while this definition of resistance applies to any component, only when the resistance is independent of VV and II do we refer to the component as a "resistor".

[The adjective "ohmic" is meant to invoke Ohm's law, which is the empirical finding that the potential difference VV across the resistor is proportional to the current II flowing through it. Ohm's law is less a law of nature than a way to characterise the relationship between VV and II. (The status is similar to "Hooke's law" for springs.)]

Which of the following is not necessarily true about a "resistor"?

Choose one answer

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems