Interactive · 3 questions
Since you're here to learn about the converse of the Power of a Point Theorem, you probably know what Power of a Point says. Just to check though, given the above diagram, which of the following is implied by Power of a Point?
Ok, now that we know Power of a Point, let's go on to the converse, i.e. if the five points satisfy and , then in fact the quadrilateral is cyclic.
To prove this, we repeat the similar triangles argument to prove Power of a Point, but do it in reverse. Also draw in the segments , to complete the triangles and .
Now, we can manipulate to get . Also, we have that by vertical angles. The previous 2 statements imply that by SAS similarity.
Now, since the 2 triangles are similar, we can match similar parts to get that . But then , so . Therefore, the quadrilateral is cyclic.
This proof works in the case when is inside the quadrilateral , but it's not completely clear that the proof works the same way when is outside. Let's do that case to check that you understand the proof.
In the above diagram, , and we wish to show that is cyclic.
From the above equation, which one below can we deduce?
In this case actually, we don't even need vertical angles. The 2 triangles that we're going to look at here actually will share the angle .
Cool. Now, this equation implies which 2 pairs of triangles are similar?
Now we can finish the proof. The above similarity gives that . But , so therefore, , so since opposite angles sum to , we once again get that is cyclic. Note that in this case, we used that opposite angles sum to , instead of inscribed angles being equal (though if you learn directed angles, these are both actually equivalent).