Derive and Use Trigonometric Identities

Before this, knowTrigonometry: Pythagorean IdentityAngle Identities in TrigonometryDefinition Identities in Trigonometry

Interactive · 2 questions

Trigonometric Identities, or Trig Identities for short, are equalities that relate the six trigonometric functions (sine, cosine, tangent, cosecant, secant, and cotangent).

Let's start with the simplest: Reciprocal Identities.

sin⁡(θ)=1csc⁡(θ)\sin(\theta)=\frac{1}{\csc(\theta)}

cos⁡(θ)=1sec⁡(θ)\cos(\theta)=\frac{1}{\sec(\theta)}

tan⁡(θ)=1cot⁡(θ)\tan(\theta)=\frac{1}{\cot(\theta)}

csc⁡(θ)=1sin⁡(θ)\csc(\theta)=\frac{1}{\sin(\theta)}

sec⁡(θ)=1cos⁡(θ)\sec(\theta)=\frac{1}{\cos(\theta)}

cot⁡(θ)=1tan⁡(θ)\cot(\theta)=\frac{1}{\tan(\theta)}

As you can see, these six identities really just tell you what the reciprocal of each function is.

Try a quick problem.

Using the Reciprocal Identities, define cosecantcosecant in terms of sinesine.

You should have gotten csc⁡(θ)=1sin⁡(θ)\csc(\theta)=\frac{1}{\sin(\theta)}.

Now let's move on to slightly more exciting identities! The Quotient Identities are pretty straightforward.

tan⁡(θ)=sin⁡(θ)cos⁡(θ)\tan(\theta)=\frac{\sin(\theta)}{\cos(\theta)}

cot⁡(θ)=cos⁡(θ)sin⁡(θ)\cot(\theta)=\frac{\cos(\theta)}{\sin(\theta)}

Next, we'll learn about the Pythagorean Identities.

sin⁡2(θ)+cos⁡2(θ)=1\sin^2(\theta)+\cos^2(\theta)=1

1+tan⁡2(θ)=sec⁡2(θ)1+\tan^2(\theta)=\sec^2(\theta)

1+cot⁡2(θ)=csc⁡2(θ)1+\cot^2(\theta)=\csc^2(\theta)

These identities derive from the Pythagorean Theorem, which you can look up over here.

Now, let's talk about the Even-Odd Identities.

sin⁡(−θ)=−sin⁡(θ)\sin(-\theta)=-\sin(\theta)

cos⁡(−θ)=cos⁡(θ)\cos(-\theta)=\cos(\theta)

tan⁡(−θ)=−tan⁡(θ)\tan(-\theta)=-\tan(\theta)

csc⁡(−θ)=−csc⁡(θ)\csc(-\theta)=-\csc(\theta)

sec⁡(−θ)=sec⁡(θ)\sec(-\theta)=\sec(\theta)

cot⁡(−θ)=−cot⁡(θ)\cot(-\theta)=-\cot(\theta)

Using all the information we've gathered so far, try to solve the following problem.

Which of the following are equivalent to sin⁡(θ)\sin(\theta)?

Choose all correct answers

Worth the struggle

Twenty minutes on one hard problem can teach more than ten easy exercises. These problems are worth staying with. These are real problems from the AMC 12 and AIME, the national math competitions for middle and high school students, each with a worked solution on LIVE by Po-Shen Loh.

Interactive · 10 questions

Trigonometric Identities

There are many trigonometric identities in the world, and I'm not going to list them all here. However, I'll continue with some of the most common and important trig identites that you must know.

tan⁡(x)=sin⁡(x)cos⁡(x)\tan(x) = \frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(x)}

This is an IMPORTANT fact. Sometimes, you might want to deal with sin and cos because most of the below identities are in sin and cos.

sin⁡2(x)+cos⁡2(x)\sin^2(x) + \cos^2(x)

What is the value of sin⁡2(x)+cos⁡2(x)\sin^2(x) + \cos^2(x), where x∈Rx \in \mathbb{R}. Let's test with some simple values.

What is the value of sin⁡2(30)+cos⁡2(30)\sin^2(30) + \cos^2(30)? (Treat everything in degrees from now on, unless I say it is in radians)

Choose one answer

Read · 2 min

Complex Numbers in Proving Trig Identities\large{\textbf{Complex Numbers in Proving Trig Identities}} Basic Facts\large{\textbf{Basic Facts}}

We define the complex numbers C\mathbb{C} as C={a+bi ∣ (a,b)∈R2},     i2=−1.\mathbb{C}=\left\{a+bi~|~(a,b)\in\mathbb{R}^2\right\}, ~~~~~i^2=-1. Here in a complex number z=a+biz=a+bi, aa is called the real part, written ℜ(z)=a\Re(z)=a and bb is called the imaginary part, written ℑ(z)=b\Im(z)=b. One good thing about dealing with complex numbers in equations is that one can equate the real and imaginary parts. For some real parameters A,B,C,DA,B,C,D we have A+Bi=C+Di   ⟺   A=C, B=D.A+Bi=C+Di ~~~\Longleftrightarrow ~~~A=C,~ B=D. Another helpful thing is the distributivity or linearity of the ℜ\Re or ℑ\Im functions. We have ℜ∑=∑ℜ,     ℑ∑=∑ℑ.\Re\sum=\sum\Re,~~~~~\Im\sum=\sum\Im.

Euler’s Formula\large{\textbf{Euler's Formula}}

The following formula was given by Leonhard Euler and is a very useful one relating complex numbers and trigonometry. For any complex xx we have eix=cos⁡x+isin⁡x.e^{ix}=\cos x+i\sin x. There are many ways to prove this. One outline is included here: first, rewrite the equation as cos⁡x+isin⁡xeix=1,\dfrac{\cos x+i\sin x}{e^{ix}}=1, consider the function y=e−ix(cos⁡x+isin⁡x)y=e^{-ix}(\cos x+i\sin x), differentiate it. The works are not shown here, but the derivative turns out to be 00 so the function must be constant. Plug in x=0x=0 to get y=1y=1, hence y=1y=1 for all xx. Notice that setting x=πx=\pi we get a beautiful identity eiπ+1=0e^{i\pi}+1=0.

Note: If you are familiar with calculus, there is also another proof involving a manipulation of the Taylor Series of sine and cosine.

De Moivre’s Formula\large{\textbf{De Moivre's Formula}}

De Moivre's Formula helps ease out computations a lot. It states that for any complex xx and integer nn (cos⁡x+isin⁡x)n=cos⁡nx+isin⁡nx.\left(\cos x+i\sin x\right)^n=\cos nx +i\sin nx. The proof is one liner if we apply Euler's formula twice as below (cos⁡x+isin⁡x)n=(eix)n=ei(nx)=cos⁡nx+isin⁡nx.\left(\cos x+i\sin x\right)^n=\left(e^{ix}\right)^n=e^{i(nx)}=\cos nx +i\sin nx. Notice that in the complex number z=eix=cos⁡x+isin⁡xz=e^{ix}=\cos x+i\sin x, we have ℜ(z)=cos⁡x\Re(z)=\cos x and ℑ(z)=sin⁡x\Im(z)=\sin x.

Complex Approaches to Trig Problems!\large{\textbf{Complex Approaches to Trig Problems!}}

1.\textbf{1.} Derive the addition formulas of sine and cosine.

Solution.\textbf{Solution}. Just notice that by applications of Euler's formula

Now equating real and imaginary part of both sides, we have cos⁡(x+y)=cos⁡xcos⁡y−sin⁡xsin⁡y\cos(x+y)=\cos x\cos y-\sin x \sin y sin⁡(x+y)=sin⁡xcos⁡y+cos⁡xsin⁡y\sin(x+y)=\sin x \cos y+\cos x\sin y deriving the formulas. □\square 2.\textbf{2.} Prove that ∑k=0n−1cos⁡2kπn=0     ∀ n∈N−{1}.\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \cos \dfrac{2k\pi}{n}=0 ~~~~~\forall~n\in\mathbb{N}-\{1\}.

Solution.\textbf{Solution}. Let z=e2πi/n=cos⁡(2π/n)+isin⁡(2π/n)z=e^{2\pi i/n}=\cos (2\pi/n)+i\sin (2\pi/n). Then we have zn=e2πi=1  ⟹  zn−1=0z^n=e^{2\pi i}=1\implies z^n-1=0. Since z≠1z\neq 1 zn−1=(z−1)(1+z+z2+⋅⋅⋅+zn−1)=0z^n-1=(z-1)\left(1+z+z^2+\cdot\cdot\cdot+z^{n-1}\right)=0 ∴  ∑k=0n−1zk=0   ⟹  ℜ∑k=0n−1zk=0.\therefore ~~\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} z^k=0~\implies \Re\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} z^k=0. Now notice that by application of De Moivre's formula zk=(cos⁡2πn+isin⁡2πn)k=cos⁡2kπn+isin⁡2kπnz^k=\left(\cos\dfrac{2\pi}{n}+i\sin\dfrac{2\pi}{n}\right)^k=\cos\dfrac{2k\pi}{n}+i\sin\dfrac{2k\pi}{n} ∴  ℜ(zk)=cos⁡2kπn.\therefore ~~ \Re\left(z^k\right)=\cos\dfrac{2k\pi}{n}. Therefore by the linearity of ℜ\Re function we finally have 0=ℜ∑k=0n−1zk=∑k=0n−1ℜ(zk)=∑k=0n−1cos⁡2kπn.□0=\Re\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} z^k=\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \Re\left(z^k\right)=\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \cos\dfrac{2k\pi}{n}. \square

3.\textbf{3.} Prove the Pythagorean identity, cos⁡2x+sin⁡2x=1\cos^2{x} + \sin^2{x} = 1.

Solution.\textbf{Solution.} We can cleverly factor cos⁡2x+sin⁡2x\cos^2{x} + \sin^2{x} as a difference of squares: (cos⁡x+isin⁡x)(cos⁡x−isin⁡x)(\cos{x} + i\sin{x})(\cos{x} - i\sin{x}). From here, we use Euler's identity, so we have cos⁡2x+sin⁡2x=(cos⁡x+isin⁡x)(cos⁡x−isin⁡x)=(eix)(e−ix)=1.\cos^2{x} + \sin^2{x}=(\cos{x} + i\sin{x})(\cos{x} - i\sin{x})=(e^{ix})(e^{-ix})=1. □\square

Two Problems To Try\large{\textbf{Two Problems To Try}}

1. (IMO 1963/5)\textbf{1. (IMO 1963/5)} Prove that cos⁡π7−cos⁡2π7+cos⁡3π7=12.\cos\dfrac{\pi}{7}-\cos\dfrac{2\pi}{7}+\cos\dfrac{3\pi}{7}=\dfrac{1}{2}.

2. (Proofathon)\textbf{2. (Proofathon)} Show that for all odd k≥3k\ge 3 cos⁡πk+cos⁡3πk+⋯+cos⁡(k−2)πk=12.\cos\dfrac{\pi}{k}+\cos\dfrac{3\pi}{k}+\cdots+\cos\dfrac{(k-2)\pi}{k}=\dfrac{1}{2}. (1\textbf{1} is a special case of 2\textbf{2}!)

Read · 1 min

Sometimes, where working with a trigonometric expression, it is useful to replace all the sin⁡θ\sin \theta and cos⁡θ\cos\theta with a rational expression in terms of a single variable. As it turn out, tan⁡θ2\tan\frac{\theta}{2} is a convenient choice.

Recall from the Double Angle Identity section that: cos⁡θ=2cos⁡2θ2−1\cos \theta=2\cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}-1 Since cos⁡2θ2+sin⁡2θ2=1\cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}+\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}=1, this can also be written as: cos⁡θ=2cos⁡2θ2cos⁡2θ2+sin⁡2θ2−1=21+tan⁡2θ2−1=1−tan⁡2θ21+tan⁡2θ2\cos \theta=\frac{2\cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}}{\cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}+\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}}-1=\frac{2}{1+\tan^2\frac{\theta}{2}}-1=\frac{1-\tan^2\frac{\theta}{2}}{1+\tan^2\frac{\theta}{2}} Now sin⁡θ\sin\theta can be dealt with in a similar fashion. Try to derive an expression for sin⁡θ\sin\theta in terms of tan⁡θ2\tan\frac{\theta}{2}

We start in the same way. Recall that: sin⁡θ=2sin⁡θ2cos⁡θ2\sin\theta=2\sin\frac{\theta}{2}\cos\frac{\theta}{2} This can be rewritten using sin⁡θ2=tan⁡θ2cos⁡θ2\sin\frac{\theta}{2}=\tan\frac{\theta}{2}\cos\frac{\theta}{2}: sin⁡θ=2tan⁡θ2cos⁡2θ2\sin\theta=2\tan\frac{\theta}{2}\cos^2\frac{\theta}{2} Now we finish exactly as before: sin⁡θ=(2tan⁡θ2)cos⁡2θ2cos⁡2θ2+sin⁡2θ2=2tan⁡θ21+tan⁡2θ2\sin\theta=(2\tan\frac{\theta}{2})\frac{\cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}}{\cos^2\frac{\theta}{2}+\sin^2\frac{\theta}{2}}=\frac{2\tan\frac{\theta}{2}}{1+\tan^2\frac{\theta}{2}} Using these two expressions, we can derive similar expressions for csc⁡θ,sec⁡θ,tan⁡θ,cot⁡θ\csc\theta, \sec\theta, \tan\theta, \cot\theta. The result is the following. If tan⁡θ2=t\tan\frac{\theta}{2}=t, then: sin⁡θ=2t1+t2\sin\theta=\frac{2t}{1+t^2} cos⁡θ=1−t21+t2\cos\theta=\frac{1-t^2}{1+t^2} tan⁡θ=2t1−t2\tan\theta=\frac{2t}{1-t^2} cot⁡θ=1−t22t\cot\theta=\frac{1-t^2}{2t} sec⁡θ=1+t21−t2\sec\theta=\frac{1+t^2}{1-t^2} csc⁡θ=1+t22t\csc\theta=\frac{1+t^2}{2t} Using these identities, any trigonometric identity with a single argument can be reduced to a polynomial verification in one variable. Additionally, this characterization can be used to prove trigonometric inequalities.

We will now work a brief example illustrating the former use.

Let θ∈(0,π2)\theta\in (0, \frac{\pi}{2}) be an angle. Simplify the following: (csc⁡θ−sin⁡θsin⁡θ+cos⁡θ+1)(sec⁡θ−cos⁡θsin⁡θ+cos⁡θ−1)\left(\frac{\csc\theta-\sin\theta}{\sin\theta+\cos\theta+1}\right)\left(\frac{\sec\theta-\cos\theta}{\sin\theta+\cos\theta-1}\right)

We let t=tan⁡θ2t=\tan\frac{\theta}{2}. Then we can simply plug in the above identities into the expression: (1+t22t−2t1+t22t1+t2+1−t21+t2+1)(1+t21−t2−1−t21+t22t1+t2+1−t21+t2−1)\left(\frac{\frac{1+t^2}{2t}-\frac{2t}{1+t^2}}{\frac{2t}{1+t^2}+\frac{1-t^2}{1+t^2}+1}\right)\left(\frac{\frac{1+t^2}{1-t^2}-\frac{1-t^2}{1+t^2}}{\frac{2t}{1+t^2}+\frac{1-t^2}{1+t^2}-1}\right) Simplifying a little, this becomes: ((1+t2)2−(2t)22t(2t+2))((1+t2)2−(1−t2)2(1−t2)(2t−2t2))\left(\frac{(1+t^2)^2-(2t)^2}{2t(2t+2)}\right)\left(\frac{(1+t^2)^2-(1-t^2)^2}{(1-t^2)(2t-2t^2)}\right) Using the fact that (1−t2)2+(2t)2=(1+t2)2(1-t^2)^2+(2t)^2=(1+t^2)^2, this can be further simplified: ((2t)2(1−t2)22(2t)(t+1)(1−t2)(2t)(1−t))\left(\frac{(2t)^2(1-t^2)^2}{2(2t)(t+1)(1-t^2)(2t)(1-t)}\right) =(4t2(1+t)2(1−t)28t2(1+t)2(1−t)2)=\left(\frac{4t^2(1+t)^2(1-t)^2}{8t^2(1+t)^2(1-t)^2}\right) =12=\frac{1}{2} And so the expression is simply 12\frac{1}{2}.

Interactive · 2 questions

Some of us have seen the formula eiθ=cos⁡θ+isin⁡θe^{i \theta} = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta before (if you haven't, check it out here!). However, this doesn't really help us find the value of cos⁡θ\cos \theta or sin⁡θ\sin \theta individually.

The best we can do is ℜ[eiθ]=cos⁡θ\Re [e^{i \theta}] = \cos \theta and ℑ[eiθ]=isin⁡θ\Im [e^{i \theta}] = i \sin \theta. (For a complex number z=a+biz = a+bi, we denote ℜ(z)=a\Re(z) = a, the real part, and ℑ(z)=b\Im(z) = b, the imaginary part.)

If we plugged another value of θ\theta into the equation, maybe we could get a system and solve for cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ\cos \theta, \sin \theta.

What value should we plug in for θ\theta?

Choose one answer

Read · 1 min

In this explanation we're going to prove the identity

tan⁡(2x)=2sin⁡(x)2cos⁡(x)−sec⁡(x).\tan(2x) = \frac{2\sin(x)}{2\cos(x) - \sec(x)}.

In doing so we're going to highlight some of the techniques you can use to prove other identities. Every time we prove an identity, we can use it to derive other ones.

A good first attempt is to work from left-to-right, trying to turn the simpler-looking side of the identity into the more complicated-looking side. In this case the left-hand side is less intimating so we start there.

We know more about sines and cosines than tangents, and they are easier to manipulate, so we write

tan⁡(2x)=sin⁡(2x)cos⁡(2x).\tan(2x) = \frac{\sin(2x)}{\cos(2x)}.

The reason this is helpful is we know double-angle identities for sine and cosine:

sin⁡(2x)=2sin⁡(x)cos⁡(x)cos⁡(2x)=2cos⁡2(x)−1\begin{align} \sin(2x) &= 2\sin(x)\cos(x) \\ \cos(2x) &= 2\cos^2(x) - 1 \end{align}

We substitute these into our previous equation:

tan⁡(2x)=2sin⁡(x)cos⁡(x)2cos⁡2(x)−1\tan(2x) = \frac{2\sin(x)\cos(x)}{2\cos^2(x) - 1}

This fraction is starting to resemble the right-hand side of the identity we wanted to prove. The numerator we have now and the numerator we want differ by a factor of cos⁡(x),\cos(x), so divide the numerator and denominator by cos⁡(x):\cos(x):

tan⁡(2x)=2sin⁡(x)cos⁡(x)cos⁡(x)2cos⁡2(x)−1cos⁡(x)=2sin⁡(x)2cos⁡(x)−sec⁡(x).\tan(2x) = \frac{\frac{2\sin(x)\cancel{\cos(x)}}{\cancel{\cos(x)}}}{\frac{2\cos^2(x) - 1}{\cos(x)}} = \frac{2\sin(x)}{2\cos(x) - \sec(x)}.

This is the same as the right-hand side of the identity we wanted to prove, so we're all done! We've successfully proven a trig identity!

One of the great things about trig identities is that there are multiple ways to prove most, if not all of them. Perhaps you can look around the other explanations and get more ideas for how to prove this identity.

Video

Verifying Trigonometric Identities

by Professor Dave Explains

In this video by Professor Dave Explains, you will be able to prove and verify the trigonometric identities.

Illustrated · 1 min

Creating New Trig Identities from Old Ones

Trig identities are math rules that are always true for certain angle functions like sine, cosine, and tangent. We've already learned some of the basic ones, like:

sin2(θ)+cos2(θ)=1\text{sin}^2(\theta) + \text{cos}^2(\theta)=1

You can use the identities you already know to create new ones!

Deriving Trig Identities

Image source: by Anusha Rahman

As we can see in the above example, we can divide both sides by cos2(θ)\text{cos}^2(\theta). So, we can simplify to:

tan2(θ)+1=sec2(θ)\text{tan}^2(\theta) + 1 = \text{sec}^2(\theta)

...and now you've just made a new identity! We used what we already knew and turned it into something new. You can also apply this new identity in real problems, like proving that two sides of an equation are equal.

You can use it to simplify an expression like sec2(θ)+tan2(θ)\text{sec}^2(\theta) + \text{tan}^2(\theta), which we now know equals 11.

You can use it to work backward: if you see tan2(θ)\text{tan}^2(\theta), you can replace it with sec2(θ)−1\text{sec}^2(\theta)-1 to make solving easier.

It's like having a toolbox - the more complex the tools, the more ways you can solve things.

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems