Read · 1 min

Proving sets or functions are measurable

For example, see MSE: Set of points at which sequence of measurable functions converge (another approach).

Or see MSE: Set of continuity points of a real function.

For functions:

  • uniform limits of continuous functions (see e.g. Wikipedia)
  • pointwise a.e. limits of measurable functions
  • min, max of finite collections/sequences
  • inf, sup, lim inf, lim sup of countable sequences
  • sums and products (maybe with some finiteness hypotheses)

Read · 1 min

List of useful examples

Read · 1 min

Overview of measure theory

A good reference for everything here is Royden-Fitzpatrick, 4th Ed., e.g. Section 3.3 on Littlewood's Three Principles.

  • Role of countable additivity, unions, and intersections (e.g. Zeno's paradox; also, intuition for why GδG_\delta and FσF_\sigma sets can be "measured", i.e. part of the consistent collection of Lebesgue measurable sets)

  • Littlewood's first principle

Continuous, Riemann integrable, and Lebesgue measurable functions

  • Riemann integral is still better for computation in many (most?) cases.

  • Philosophical flexibility of Lebesgue measurable functions (esp. in context of integration of, say, χQ\chi_{ \mathbb{Q}} or other things that Riemann doesn't handle)

  • Pointwise limits, Egoroff's theorem, and Littlewood's third principle

  • Simple approximation of Lebesgue measurable functions, Lusin's theorem, and Littlewood's second principle

Read · 1 min

Sequences of functions & modes of convergence

  • Converges pointwise
  • Converges pointwise a.e. (almost everywhere)
  • Converges uniformly
  • Converges almost uniformly
  • Converges in LpL^p-norm (see here for how to interpret p=∞p=\infty case: it ends up being equivalent to "uniformly almost everywhere")
  • Converges in measure

References

Read · 1 min

Overview of integration theory

A good reference for everything here is Royden-Fitzpatrick, 4th Ed., e.g. Chapters 4-6.

  • Riemann integral is modeled off of lower and upper step functions
  • Lebesgue integral is modeled off of simple functions instead
  • Riemann is bad for Dirichlet's function χQ\chi_{ \mathbb{Q}}, the indicator function of the rational numbers; Lebesgue handles it better (roughly speaking, Riemann requires function preimages to have reasonable topology, requiring "simple vertical slabs" from the viewpoint of inputs, i.e. the independent variable, or requiring "interval-union-like horizontal slabs" from the viewpoint of outputs, i.e. the dependent variable; Lebesgue cares only about measurability of preimages, allowing "more complicated but still measurable horizontal slabs" from the viewpoint of outputs)
  • See the interesting discussion at MO: Why should one still teach Riemann integration? as well.

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems