Nested radicals are something in the form of
n1x1n2x2n3x3...
where ni,xi∈R. (ni is not written when ni=2, and you should know that earlier!)
These nested radicals may repeated finitely many times like 123, and this type of nested radicals is known as Finite Nested Radicals. The example shows a finite nested radical with 3 nests.
Obviously if we have "finite", then we must have "infinite"! For nested radicals like 123..., we name it as infinite nested radicals.
In the next chapter, we are going to talk about denesting a nested radical. In fact most of the chapters will focus on denesting nested square roots. Stay tuned!
Credits to Elementary Analysis on Ramanujan’s Nested Radicals.
Chapter 2: Denesting 2-Nested and 3-Nested Radicals
Part 1: Denest a 2-Nested Radical.
Before I start, let's have some revision.
Which of these is a 2-Nested Radical?
Now, let's start denesting! Denesting 2-Nested Radicals is just a piece of cake if we use algebraic methods, as shown below. Let
a+bc=d+e
Where RHS is made up of 2 one-nested radicals.
So, in next step, what should we do?
Squaring both sides, we have
a+bc=d+e+2de
Now, we compare both sides.
Which of these comparisons are the most suitable?
So, by comparing both sides, or equating the integer part and radical part to each other, we get
abc=d+e−(1)=2de−(2)
Solving (2) by squaring both sides yields b2c=4de.
Substituting d=a−e into (2) gives 4e2−4ae+b2c=0 after some rearranging.
At this point, you may substitute the values of a,b,c to solve for e and thus denest the radical. But warning, if e is not real, just ignore it for a real-valued radical.
Now, try to denest 3+22 and 9+45 using the steps above.
Now what? Let's denest a three-nested radical! Let
a+bc+de=f+g+h
Squaring both sides,
a+bc+de=f+g+h+2fg+fh
Therefore a=f+g−(3) and bc+de=h+2fg+fh−(4)
Squaring (4) yields
b2c+b2de=h+4fg+4fh+4fgh+fhh
giving
b2c=h+4fgb2de=4fh+4fgh+fhh
Things are getting more complicated, so the rest of the steps to denesting it into one-nested radicals are left as an exercise to the reader.
In the next chapter, we are going to talk about the Ramanujan's Nested Radicals, which is even complicated. Stay tuned!
Credits to Elementary Analysis on
Ramanujan’s Nested
Radicals
Ramanujan's Radicals are actually are radicals in the form of
x+n+a=ax+(n+a)2+xa(x+n)+(n+a)2+(x+n)...a[x+(k−1)n]+(n+a)2+x[x+(n+1)+a]
Why does the both sides of the equality holds? This is actually derived from a simple expansion that is
(x+a)2=x2+2ax+a2
Now replace a with n+a. How should you rewrite the new expression? (Clarification: x,a,n∈R)
Taking positive square roots on both sides, we have
x+a+n=ax+(n+a)2+x(x+a+2n)−(1)
Replacing x with x+n,
(x+n)+a+n=a(x+n)+(n+a)2+(x+n)((x+n)+a+2n)x+2n+a=a(x+n)+(n+a)2+(x+n)(x+3n+a)−(2)
Similarly,
x+3n+a=a(x+2n)+(n+a)2+(x+n)(x+4n+a)−(3)
And
x+4n+a=a(x+3n)+(n+a)2+(x+n)(x+5n+a)−(4)
So, what can you conclude about the results above?
Substituting (2) into (1) implies
x+a+n=ax+(n+a)2+xa(x+n)+(n+a)2+(x+n)(x+3n+a)−(5)
Again, substituting (3) into (5) gives
x+a+n=ax+(n+a)2+xa(x+n)+(n+a)2+(x+n)a(x+2n)+(n+a)2+(x+n)(x+4n+a)
Repeatedly substituting till k terms. What do you get?
Great! We had derived the Ramanujan's radical!
In fact x=xxx... Why?
Challenge
i) Write 3 in the form of infinite nested radicals. Start your solution by setting x=a=n=1.
ii) Then write 3u in the form of infinite nested radicals. Set x=a=n=u.
iii) What can you say about the solutions in (i) and (ii)?
Chapter 4 Sneak Peak: Nested Radicals in the form of a+ba+ba+b...
Credits to Elementary Analysis on
Ramanujan’s Nested
Radicals
Chapter 5: Relationship between Nested Radicals and Continued Fractions.
Part 1: Introduction of continued fractions
Continued fractions are those fractions in the type of
a1+a2+a3+a4+...b3b2b1
where ai,bi∈C. But we will only focus in Z.
Most numbers can be written in the form of continued fractions as an example,
3176=3+2+1+5111
Sometimes, for the sake of laziness, we may write continued fractions as
a1+a2+a3+a4+...b3b2b1=[a1;a2,a3,...]
Iff bi=1, aka a simple continued fraction.
Like nested radicals, continued fractions can be infinite.
In Part 2, we are going to study the relationship between the nested radicals and the continued fractions.
Are you ready? Click to continue.
Part 2: Relationship between the nested radicals and the continued fractions.
In the last chapter, we studied the nested radicals of the type a+ba+ba+b.... So the continued fraction we want to study now is of course a little bit special, which is a+a+a+a+a+...bbbb
And it goes infinite~
Now, we want to show that this type of continued fraction converges where a,b∈N0.Let
k⟹k=a+a+a+a+a+...bbbb=a+kb−(1)
Solving k in terms of a,b, we get
k=2a+a2+4b−(2)
And the step from (1) to (2) is left as an exercise to the reader.
Recalling back the equation we derived in the last chapter,
a+ba+ba+b...=2b+b2+4a
And compare what we got just now.
What's your conclusion?
Chapter 6 Sneak Peek: Identities derived from nested radicals
Credits to Wikipedia and Elementary Analysis on Ramanujan's Nested Radicals.
Chapter 6: Identities derived from nested radicals
Part 1: 2b+b1+4ω=ωb2+ωb4+ωb8+...
Recalling the formula derived in Chapter 4,
a+ba+ba+b...=2b+b2+4a
We can rewrite LHS as
a+ab2+ab6+ab14+...
Why?
Look, 0,2,6,14,... is not nice! Let's try to add 2 to each term, what do you get?
But how do we add 2 to the powers? We are going to "multiply 1 cleverly", but the question is the same, how?
Therefore,
2b+b2+4a=(b2a)(b2)+(b2a)(b4)+(b2a)(b8)+...
Setting ω=b2a gives
2b+b1+4ω=ωb2+ωb4+ωb8+...
So, we are done!
Part 2: x+a=a2+xa2+(x+a)a2+(x+2a)...a2+(x+a)[x+(n+1)a]
In chapter 4, we learned on how to write sum of any three numbers in the form of nested radicals. But how about two numbers? We are going to use the same concept here, which is
(x+a)2=x2+a2+2ax=x2+a2+ax+ax
Taking square root on both sides,
x+a=x2+a2+ax+ax=a2+x(x+a+a)−(0)
Replacing x with x+a and x+2a gives
x+a+a=a2+(x+a)(x+2a+a)−(1)and x+2a+a=a2+(x+2a)(x+3a+a)−(2)
respectively. Substituting (2) into (1) yields
x+a=a2+xa2+(x+a)(x+2a+a)−(3)
Now, repeat this by replacing x in (0) with x+3a, x+4a, ...,x+na and substituting into (3), what do you get?
Wala! DoNe!
Chapter 7 Sneak Peek: Denesting a n-th degree nested radical
Credits to Elementary Analysis on Ramanujan's Nested Radicals.
Lets say we want to find the sum and product of the roots of 5x2+3x+1=0.
Unfortunately the roots are complex.
Assume you didn't know how to add or multiply complex numbers how would you find their sum and product?
Well if r1 and r2 are the roots then we can write 5(x−r1)(x−r2)=0. Expanding this we obtain 5x2−5(r1+r2)x+5r1r2.
Comparing this to the coefficients of the original quadratic we get −5(r1+r2)=3
and r1+r2=−53
Also we get 5r1r2=1 so r1r2=51.
We found the sum and product of the roots without actually solving for them!
In general for a quadratic ax2+bx+c=0 we can write a(x−r1)(x−r2)=0 and using the same methods as above we get ax2−a(r1+r2)x+ar1r2=0.
Comparing to the coefficients of the original quadratic we get r1+r2=−ab and r1r2=ac. These are Vieta's Formulas for a Quadratic.
In conclusion, Vietas formulas for a quadratic state that for a general quadratic ax2+bx+c the sum of the roots is −ab and the product of the roots is ac
Chapter 7: Convergence of a n-th degree nested radical
Recalling that in Chapter 4, we proved that a nested square root converges, but now, what if I ask you to prove that a n-th nested root converges, where n>2?
Let's consider a nested square root of the type
na+bna+bna+bn...
where it converges when a,b∈N0. Set
kk0=na+bna+bna+bn...=na+bk=kn−bk−a
At this step, can we claim that k=2b+nb+4a?
To solve this, let a=αkn,b=βkn−1. We have kn−βkn−αknβ=0=1−α
Means that
k=nαkn+βkn−1nαkn+βkn−1n...
Proving that it converges. In fact, you can stop at 0=kn−bk−a by substituting the values of a,b
Chapter 8 Sneak Peek: Existence of denesting in 2-nd degree of nested radicals of the form 3α−3β
Credits to Elementary Analysis on Ramanujan's Nested Radicals.
Chapter 8: Existence of denesting in 2nd degree of nested radicals of the form 3α−3β
In this chapter, we are going to determine if a nested radical in the form 3α−3β. We claim that ∀α,β∈Q\{0}, if in
Fβ/α(t)=t4+4t3+8αβt−4αβ
and ∃t∈Q,f(t)=0, then 3α−3β is denestable.
Sketch of proof: Realizing that 3α−3β is denestable iff 1+3αβ is denestable. This happens iff ∃f,x,y,z∈Q such that
1+3αβ=f(x(1)+y3αβ+z3α2β2)2
Expanding RHS and compare the like powers of 3α2β2 with LHS to get
f10f1=x2+α2yzβ=y2+2xz=αβz2+2xy
It is easy to see that z=0,Fβ/α(zy)=0. Conversely, if Fβ/α(s)=0, then the denesting is
3α−3β=±f1(2−s2(3α2)+s3αβ+β2),f=β−s3α■
Now try to denest 35−34,328−327 using the steps above.