Illustrated · 1 min

Pappus's (Hexagonal) Theorem

Now we will look at Pappus's theorem. It states that

Suppose the vertices of a hexagon alternately lie on two lines. Then the three pairs of opposite sides intersect at points that are collinear.

This is a specific case of Pascal's Theorem.

Proof of the Theorem

The proof that I am going to present will require some knowledge in projective geometry.

Lemma 1: A projectivity that maps a range to another is a perspectivity if and only if the intersection of the two lines are invariant under projectivity.

Proof: The intersection is obviously invariant under projectivity. Suppose that a projectivity leaves the intersection invariant. Let AA and BB be two points in the first range and A′A' and B′B' be the two corresponding points. Let OO be the intersection of AA′AA' and BB′BB'. Then by the fundamental theorem of projective geometry, we have that the perspectivity mapping ABEABE to A′B′EA'B'E is the same as the projectivity we defined. □\Box

Now time for the proof of the theorem.

Proof of the Theorem: Suppose we have hexagon A1B2C1A2B1C2A_1B_2C_1A_2B_1C_2, as shown below. Let HH be the intersection of A1B2A_1B_2 and A2C1A_2C_1, II be the intersection of A1C2A_1C_2 and B2C1B_2C_1, and GG be the intersection of A1B1A_1B_1 and A2B2A_2B_2.

Notice that A1FHB2⩞A1B1C1GA_1FHB_2 \doublebarwedge A_1B_1C_1G from point A2A_2 and A1B1C1G⩞IDC1B2A_1B_1C_1G \doublebarwedge IDC_1B_2 from point C2C_2 so there is a unique projectivity from A1FHA_1FH and IDC1IDC_1. Since B2B_2, the intersection of the two lines, is invariant under the projectivity, we have that it is a perspectivity from EE. Thus DD, EE, and FF are collinear. □\Box References

  1. H. S. M. Coxeter, Projective Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1987

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems