Read · 2 min

One way in which we can prove combinatorial identities is through "Committee Forming". In order to get an idea of what this really means, let us look at some examples!

Prove that n(n−1r−1)=r(nr).n\binom{n-1}{r-1} = r\binom{n}{r}.

Well, we can use our so called "committee forming" in order to prove this identity. Suppose that we have nn people and we are trying to choose a committee of size rr with a president.

We could initially choose the president in nn different ways. Then, we can choose the other r−1r-1 people from the remaining n−1n-1. This is equivalent to n(n−1r−1)n\binom{n-1}{r-1} ways. This is our left hand side!

Now, let's see our right hand side. Well, we can choose the committee in (nr)\binom{n}{r} ways. Now we just have to choose one of the members of the committee to be the president. This can be done in rr ways. So this is equivalent to r(nr)r\binom{n}{r} ways. Hey! This is our right hand side!

So therefore, with this committee forming argument, we have proved the expression.

Prove that (nk)(km)=(nm)(n−mk−m).\binom{n}{k} \binom{k}{m} = \binom{n}{m} \binom{n-m}{k-m}.

Well, consider a pool of nn people to choose from. We want to form a committee of size kk and then from those people, we want to form a subcommittee of size mm. In the left hand side, we are doing exactly that.

However on the right hand side, we are choosing the subcommittee of size first mm. Only after that are we choosing the remaining people to be in the committee of mm. Notice that we can't choose any of the mm people already, so there are n−mn-m people to choose from. Now notice that we only have to choose k−mk-m more members since every member of the subcommittee is a member of the committee. This is equivalent to the right hand side!

So we are counting the same thing in two different ways! Remember if you ever get stuck in proving one of these combinatorial identities, think to yourself: How do the left hand side and right hand side count the same thing?

Prove Vandermonde's Identity which states that: ∑k=0r(mk)(nr−k)=(m+nr).\sum_{k=0}^r \binom{m}{k} \binom{n}{r-k} = \binom{m+n}{r}.

Well, this looks like kind of a mess! However, realize that we are adding a bunch of things together. When we do this, this often suggests that there are different cases to consider.

So suppose that we have a pool of mm people and another pool of nn people. Among them we want to choose an rr person committee. Alright, so this has the right side covered.

Now, we could take 00 people from the mm-sized pool and rr people from the nn-sized pool...11 person from the mm-sized pool and r−1r-1 from the nn-sized pool .....22 people and r−2r-2 people..... all the way to rr people from the mm-sized pool and 00 people from the nn-sized pool. Note that the left hand side sums up all of these individual cases!

So, we have proved this identity!

This method is a neat way to prove many of these combinatorial identities. It can be especially fruitful when the algebra is really messy. Happy solving!

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems