When looking at arithmetic sequences, why look at them as a, a+d, a+2d, a+3d, a+4d? Why not look at them as a−2d, a−d, a, a+d, a+2d? Symmetry makes nice cancellations occur!
Similarly, when looking at geometric sequences why look at them as a, ar, ar2, ar3, ar4? Why not look at them as r2a, ra, a, ar, ar2?
Problem (ARML 2011): The product of the first five terms of a geometric sequence is 32. If the fourth term is 17, compute the second term.
Solution: Let the terms be r2a, ra, a, ar, ar2. Then r2ara(a)(ar)(ar2)=32 so a5=32 so a=2. Then 17=ar=2r so r=217. Therefore, the second term is just 17/22=174.
Problem (ARML 2012): The four zeros of x4+jx2+kx+225 are distinct real numbers in arithmetic progression. Compute the value of j.
Solution: This trick doesn't only apply to an odd number of terms! Take a−23d, a−21d, a+21d, a+41d. By Vieta's formulas, the roots sum to 0 so a=0! Therefore the roots are just −23d, −21d, 21d, 23d, but their product must be
2432d4=225=152⟹d=±25
We can assume d=25 by symmetry, so
the roots are −35, −5, 5, and 35. We can easily find j from here.
Problem (104 Number Theory Problems by Titu Andreescu): Give an example of 11 consecutive positive integers the sum of whose squares is a perfect square.