সংযুক্তি: কোনো ফাংশনের টেইলর সিরিজ কনভার্জ করলেও সেটা ওই ফাংশনের মানের সমান নাও হতে পারে

Before this, knowকোথায় একটা ফাংশনের মান তার টেইলর ধারার সমান হয়?

Illustrated · 2 min

It turns out a function ff can have a Taylor series that doesn't converge to ff anywhere, except at its center. (The value at the center point aa is just f(a)f(a) so no convergence issues.) It's possible that in every neighborhood of the center, the Taylor series converges to the wrong function.

The classic example of such a function is f(x)={e−1/x,x>00,x≤0f(x)=\begin{cases}e^{-1/x},&x>0\\0,&x\le0\end{cases}. (Its close relative g(x)={e−1/x2,x≠00,x=0g(x)=\begin{cases}e^{-1/x^2},&x\ne0\\0,&x=0\end{cases} also works.) Certainly f(x)≠0f(x)\ne0 for any x>0x>0. Nevertheless, its Maclaurin series is just the constant function 00, which is not equal to ff for any x>0x>0 !!

Here's a graph of the function ff:

Notice it looks pretty flat at x=0x=0, which is intuitively how the Taylor series can just be the constant zero - All the derivatives of ff at 00 are just zero!

Ready for the details and proof?

We will show that f(n)(0)=0f^{(n)}(0)=0, so that its Maclaurin series is just M(x)=0M(x)=0, which is not equal to ff for any x>0x>0.

Since f(x)=0f(x)=0 for x<0x<0, then f(n)(x)=0f^{(n)}(x)=0 for x<0x<0, which implies that the left handed derivative at 00 is: f−(n)(0)=lim⁡x→0−f(n−1)(x)−f(n−1)(0)x−0=0.f^{(n)}_-(0)=\lim_{x\to0^-}\frac{f^{(n-1)}(x)-f^{(n-1)}(0)}{x-0}=0. So to conclude that f(n)(0)=0f^{(n)}(0)=0, we now need to show that f+(n)(0)=0f^{(n)}_+(0)=0.

We first use induction to show that for x>0x>0, there exists some polynomial pn(t)p_n(t) such that f(n)(x)=pn(1/x)e−1/x.f^{(n)}(x)=p_n(1/x)e^{-1/x}. In other words, the nnth derivative of ff is a finite sum of terms of the form cxke−1/x\frac{c}{x^k}e^{-1/x} for some constants cc and kk that may vary from term to term. (It can even be shown that pnp_n is of degree 2n2n.) Taking a few derivatives of ff will give you some motivation for this result.

Why is this fact useful? If we have f(n)(x)=pn(1/x)e−1/xf^{(n)}(x)=p_n(1/x)e^{-1/x}, then we take the limit as x→0+x\to0^+ to compute f[n]=0f^{[n]}=0 - We'll look more into these details after proving the fact.

This statement is true for n=1n=1, since f′(x)=e−1/x⋅1x2,f'(x)=e^{-1/x}\cdot\frac{1}{x^2}, where p1(t)=t2p_1(t)=t^2 and p1(1x)=1x2p_1\big(\frac{1}{x}\big)=\frac{1}{x^2}.

Now we suppose that f(k)(x)=pk(1/x)e−1/xf^{(k)}(x)=p_k(1/x)e^{-1/x} for some n=kn=k. We differentiate once to get f(k+1)(x)=ddx[f(k)(x)]=ddx[pk(1/x)e−1/x]f(k+1)(x)=pk′(1/x)⋅−1x2e−1/x+pk(1/x)e−1/x⋅1x2f(k+1)(x)=[pk′(1/x)⋅−1x2+pk(1/x)⋅1x2]e−1/x,\begin{align*} f^{(k+1)}(x)=\frac{d}{dx}\left[f^{(k)}(x)\right]&=\frac{d}{dx}\left[p_k(1/x)e^{-1/x}\right] \\ f^{(k+1)}(x)&=p'_k(1/x)\cdot\frac{-1}{x^2}e^{-1/x}+p_k(1/x)e^{-1/x}\cdot\frac{1}{x^2} \\ f^{(k+1)}(x)&=\left[p'_k(1/x)\cdot\frac{-1}{x^2}+p_k(1/x)\cdot\frac{1}{x^2}\right]e^{-1/x}, \end{align*} and we see that pk+1(1/x)=[pk′(1/x)⋅−1x2+pk(1/x)⋅1x2]p_{k+1}(1/x)=\left[p'_k(1/x)\cdot\frac{-1}{x^2}+p_k(1/x)\cdot\frac{1}{x^2}\right], which is still a polynomial in terms of 1x\frac{1}{x}. Thus f(k+1)(x)=pk+1e−1/xf^{(k+1)}(x)=p_{k+1}e^{-1/x}, so we can conclude that f(n)(x)=pn(1/x)e−1/xf^{(n)}(x)=p_n(1/x)e^{-1/x} for all n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}.

Now using our formula for the kkth derivative, we can compute f+[k](0)f^{[k]}_+(0).

Method 1: We have f[n](x)=pn(1/x)e−1/x.f^{[n]}(x)=p_n(1/x)e^{-1/x}. Now we use the fact that f+[n](0)=lim⁡x→0+f[n](x)f^{[n]}_+(0)=\lim_{x\to0^+}f^{[n]}(x) when the limit exists. (Proof of this fact by using continuity of f[n−1]f^{[n-1]} and mean value theorem.) Note that lim⁡x→0+1xke−1/x=lim⁡t→+∞tke−t=0\lim_{x\to0^+}\frac{1}{x^k}e^{-1/x}=\lim_{t\to+\infty}t^ke^{-t}=0 for any k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}. Since pn(1/x)p_n(1/x) is just a bunch of powers of 1x\frac{1}{x} with constants, when we multiply by e−1/xe^{-1/x} we get the limit f+[n](x)=lim⁡x→0+pn(1/x)e−1/x=0.f^{[n]}_+(x)=\lim_{x\to0^+}p_n(1/x)e^{-1/x}=0.

Method 2 (induction): When n=1n=1, then f+′(0)=lim⁡x→0+f(x)−f(0)x−0=lim⁡x→0+e−1/xx=lim⁡t→∞te−t=0,f'_+(0)=\lim_{x\to0^+}\frac{f(x)-f(0)}{x-0}=\lim_{x\to0^+}\frac{e^{-1/x}}{x}=\lim_{t\to\infty}te^{-t}=0, where we used the equality lim⁡x→0+f(1x)=lim⁡t→∞f(t)\lim_{x\to0^+}f\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)=\lim_{t\to\infty}f(t) (provided either limit exists).

Now we suppose that f+(k)(0)=0f^{(k)}_+(0)=0 for some n=kn=k. By the definition of the derivative,

f+(k+1)(0)=lim⁡x→0+f(k)(x)−f(k)(0)x−0=lim⁡x→0+f(k)(x)xf+(k+1)(0)=lim⁡x→0+pk(1/x)⋅1x⋅e−1/x=lim⁡t→∞pk(t)⋅tet=0,\begin{align*} f^{(k+1)}_+(0)&=\lim_{x\to0^+}\frac{f^{(k)}(x)-f^{(k)}(0)}{x-0} \\ &=\lim_{x\to0^+}\frac{f^{(k)}(x)}{x}\\ f^{(k+1)}_+(0)&=\lim_{x\to0^+}p_k(1/x)\cdot\frac{1}{x}\cdot e^{-1/x} \\ &=\lim_{t\to\infty}\frac{p_k(t)\cdot t}{e^t}=0, \end{align*}

since et→∞e^t\to\infty faster than any power (or polynomial) of tt. This can also be seen by repeated use of L'Hospital's Rule or other methods.

Thus f+(k+1)(0)=0f^{(k+1)}_+(0)=0, and so f+(n)(0)=0f^{(n)}_+(0)=0 for all n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. Since we already know that f−(n)(0)=0f^{(n)}_-(0)=0, we can now conclude that f(n)(0)=0f^{(n)}(0)=0.

Thus the Taylor series for ff centered at x=0x=0 is M(x)=∑n=0∞f(n)(0)n!xn=∑n=0∞0=0,M(x)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!}x^n=\sum_{n=0}^\infty0=0, which is convergent ∀ x∈R\forall\,x\in\mathbb{R}. But since f(x)≠0f(x)\ne0 for x>0x>0, no open interval around x=0x=0 exists such that M(x)=0M(x)=0 is equal to f(x)f(x).

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems