Interactive · 3 questions
Here, you might have already encountered Pascal's triangle. This explanation mentions how if we consider an 'addition triangle', then the -th term in the -th row is equal to . It mentions a few patterns - how the sum of terms in the -th row is , or the Hockey Stick Identity, and finally, the Binomial Expansion.
(Here, we will use the notation for - I believe it is more common in mathematical literature.)
The goal of this explanation is to prove these observations, and show some basic techniques for operating with binomial coefficients.
There are two tools we will thoroughly use:
-
the identity ,
-
the Binomial Theorem
The Binomial Theorem is proven in the link, and the second identity follows from expanding the formula .
First of all, let's establish that the Pascal Triangle indeed is the same as the binomial coefficients arranged into a triangle. To see this, it is enough to show that both have that addition property that each term is the sum of the two terms above it, because due to , the numbers on the sides of both triangles are all .
But what justifies this addition property?
The Hockey Stick Identity just follows from using 1) again and again. Written with binomial coefficients, it looks like this:
\begin{align} \binom nk&=\binom{n-1}{k-1}+\binom{n-1}k \ &= \binom{n-1}{k-1}+\binom{n-2}{k-1}+\binom{n-2}k \ &= \dots \ &= \binom{n-1}{k-1}+\binom{n-2}{k-1}+\dots+\binom{k}{k-1}+\binom{k}{k} \ &= \binom{n-1}{k-1}+\binom{n-2}{k-1}+\dots+\binom{k}{k-1}+\binom{k-1}{k-1} \end{align}
Another observation was that the sum of the numbers in the -th row of the Pascal Triangle is
Why?
I would like to mention one more important property of the Pascal Triangle. This is almost too obvious to mention: the numbers in each row increase until the middle, and then they start decreasing.
Why?
If we expanded them, we'd get
Hence, this fraction is if , i.e. , it is if and it is if . Therefore, if is even, i.e. , then
and if , then
What can we deduce from here? Since is the largest number in the -th row of the Pascal Triangle, it is larger than the average of the numbers in the -th row, which is . Similarly, . However, we still have and , so .
A similarly important result is that