Наближення константою в точці

Interactive · 1 question

Let's say we want to approximate the function f(x)=exf(x)=e^x. A constant approximation at a point x=cx=c (where cc is a constant) would be the horizontal line y=ecy=e^c.

For example, here is a constant approximation of f(x)=exf(x)=e^x about point 00:

What is the equation of a constant approximation of the function f(x)f(x) about point cc?

Choose one answer

Interactive · 1 question

Error analysis for the zeroth order approximation is very simple, and as noted in the previous article, the error is very significant. Consider the function f(x)=exf(x)= e^x, whose approximation is the horizontal line y=ecy=e^c, as we found in the previous article. The graph of both functions is shown below.

The error function, denoted E(x), in this case would be defined as E(x)=∣ex−ec∣E(x) = |e^x - e^c|. To see why this is true, notice our function measures the distance between our function and the approximation. In other words, it measures how far off our approximation is from our actual function. E(x), for f(x)=exf(x) = e^x is graphed below.

As you can see, the error increases significantly as x gets large. Therefore, our zeroth order approximation is very inaccurate. This motivates a desire for higher degree approximations, which will be explored in another topic.

Finally, the general definition for the error function of zeroth degree must be stated. For a function f(x), and a constant approximation of f(c), the error function E(x) is given by: E(x)=∣f(x)−f(c)∣\boxed {E(x) = |f(x) - f(c)|}.

Now for a question:

What is the error function for the constant approximation of f(x)=x2f(x) = x^2 about the point (3,9)?

Choose one answer

Illustrated · 1 min

Let's consider an infinitely differentiable function ff that we'd like to approximate close to a point aa. That is, let's try to find a function gg that is easy to calculate such that if xx is close to aa, then g(x)g(x) is close to f(x)f(x).

The simplest approximation to ff near aa, which we will call g0g_0, should require no knowledge but the value of ff at aa. Namely: g0(x)=f(a)g_0(x) = f(a). One might complain that this is not a very good approximation at all - and in fact it isn't! But extremely close to aa, it does okay. Let's look at f(x)=exf(x) = e^x, a=ca = c for some number cc.

Then f(c)=ecf(c) = e^c, so we have g0(x)=ecg_0(x) = e^c. As you can see in the plot below, this isn't very good - so we'd like to be able to do better.

In the next section, we'll analyze the error of this approximation. Then, we'll find a better one!

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems