扩展:欧几里德引理(复合因子)

Read · 1 min

As seen from before, we have the following: Given a prime such that p∣abp\mid ab, we have p∣ap\mid a or p∣bp\mid b.

Since pp is a prime, this intuitively makes sense. If it didn't divide both, then there would need to be "parts" of the prime coming from both aa and bb, which means it wouldn't be prime.

So, we wish to generalize, so that pp is not necessarily prime. What was nice before was that we couldn't have parts coming from both aa and bb. Thus, we try to recreate that.

Theorem: Given nn such that n∣abn\mid ab, and gcd⁡(n,a)=1\gcd(n,a)=1, we have n∣bn\mid b.

This theorem works similarly. If n∣abn\mid ab, then we have that aa and bb combine to make a multiple of nn. However, if gcd⁡(n,a)=1\gcd(n,a)=1, no part of nn must come from aa. Thus, all parts must come from bb, so n∣bn\mid b.

Proof: Since gcd⁡(n,a)=1\gcd(n,a)=1, by Bezout's Identity there exists integers x,yx,y such that nx+ay=1nx+ay=1. Multiplying by bb, we have nbx+aby=bnbx+aby=b. Since n∣abn\mid ab, we have n∣abyn\mid aby. Thus, n∣nbx+abyn\mid nbx+aby. Hence n∣bn\mid b. □\Box

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems