Illustrated · 1 min

The third of Kepler's laws about planetary motion says the following.

The square of the orbital period of a planet is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit.

Here, the orbital period of a planet is the time it takes to go around the ellipse exactly once. And recall that, in an ellipse, the length of the red segment below is the length of the semi-major axis (it is half the length of the major axis).

caption

Remarkably, Kepler figured this out only from data and without a theory; i.e. it was done completely empirically. It turned out that this law become one of the great validations of Newton's Theory of Gravity.

Read · 1 min

Kepler used the empirical data of Tycho Brahe to conclude that if TT is the period and RR is the average radius of a planet in orbital motion, then

T2∝R3.T^2 \propto R^3.

Note that this law was merely an observation derived from analysis of emperical data. For example, if I had a table of periods and radii for various planets, I can construct a log-log plot of that data to find this relationship that Kepler pointed out.

Now let's look at how we get this result from Newton's Law of Gravity. If mm is the mass of the orbiting planet, MM is the mass of the orbited planet, RR is the average distance between mm and the center of mass of the two-planet system, and GG is the universal gravitational constant, then

Fg=MmGR2.F_g = \frac{MmG}{R^2}.

A planet orbiting around the larger planet experiences centripetal acceleration. So then if vv is the average speed of the orbiting planet,

mv2R=MmGR2.\frac{mv^2}{R} = \frac{MmG}{R^2}.

We can then write that the speed of the planet as distance over time, or the circumference over the period. Thus v=2πRTv = \frac{2 \pi R}{T}, where TT is the period. We now can make this substitution into the equation above:

4π2mRT2=MmGR2.\frac{4 \pi^2 mR}{T^2} = \frac{MmG}{R^2}.

With some rearranging, we find that

T2=4π2GMR3.T^2 = \frac{4 \pi^2 G}{M} R^3.

This derivation assumes approximately circular orbits however. The calculus for the derivation that uses elliptical orbits takes away from the simplicity of the argument made here (but if you are curious, feel free to look at this link: http://astro.physics.uiowa.edu/~srs/2961_12/Lec09_notes.pdf

The result in general happens to be that

T2=4π2GMa3,T^2 = \frac{4 \pi^2 G}{M} a^3,

where aa is the length of the semi-major axis.

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems