Read · 2 min

We already know that all positive integers (other than the unit 11) have a unique prime factorization, this is the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic (proven here).

Here, we left out 11 because it has no prime divisors. Another way to look at it, however, is as a number whose prime factorization contains only 00 exponents. Naturally, 1=20=20⋅30⋅501=2^0=2^0\cdot 3^0\cdot 5^0 etc., but if we allow zero exponents, the factorization ceases to be unique.

A way to implement 00 exponents in the prime factorization of nn without losing unicity would be just to imagine all the prime numbers in the product, and simply give a 00 exponent to those not dividing nn. The exponent of an arbitrary prime pp in this product is denoted by vp(n)v_p(n) (called the pp-adic valuation of nn). Thus, we may write

n=2v2(n)⋅3v3(n)⋅5v5(n)⋅…=∏p primepvp(n).n=2^{v_2(n)}\cdot 3^{v_3(n)}\cdot 5^{v_5(n)}\cdot \ldots=\prod_{p\text{ prime}} p^{v_p(n)}.

In fact, we may identify each positive integer with the sequence (v2(n),v3(n),v5(n),...)(v_2(n),v_3(n),v_5(n),...). We may find a prime factorization for all the positive rational numbers in a similar fashion. Since we must allow reciprocation, we should allow negative integer exponents in this sequence as well.

Having done that, we may quickly extend unique factorization. Essentially, a prime factorization of a rational number qq means a sequence of integer exponents (v2(q),v3(q),v5(q),...)(v_2(q),v_3(q),v_5(q),...) - only finitely many of whom are nonzero -, which satisfies

q=∏p primepvp(q).q=\prod_{p\text{ prime}} p^{v_p(q)}.

We claim that every rational number has a unique prime factorization. Clearly, such a factorization exists - just write qq as a fraction ab\frac ab and take the primes in bb with negative exponents, i.e. let vp(ab)=vp(a)−vp(b)v_p(\frac ab)=v_p(a)-v_p(b). Moreover, this factorization is unique because if we had two different factorizations, then we could multiply qq by an appropriate positive integer to obtain two different factorizations of a positive integer, contradicting the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic.

(Maybe this last sentence was a bit unclear, so let's take an example - say if (−1,2,3,0,0,0,...)(-1,2,3,0,0,0,...) and (2,−3,4,0,0,0,...)(2,-3,4,0,0,0,...) yields the prime factorizations of the same number, then multiplying this number by 21⋅332^1\cdot 3^3, we see that (0,5,3,0,0,0,...)(0,5,3,0,0,0,...) and (3,0,4,0,0,0,...)(3,0,4,0,0,0,...) give two different prime factorizations of a positive integer, contradiction.)

The concept of pp-adic valuation is useful mainly as a notation, and it also gives deeper insight into prime factorization. Try to prove some of its properties in the following problems.

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems