Read · 2 min

Telescoping sums (or telescoping series) are series whose partial sums eventually cancel each other out to leave certain initial and final terms. The name arises from older telescopes, which often had multiple components that could be "squished" to a smaller size. In this regard, telescoping sums can be viewed as an example of a huge class of math problems using the "top-down" approach; breaking a problem into simpler components often reveals important patterns.

Evaluating a telescoping sum often requires the knowledge of how to decompose fractions into partial fractions. The technique of partial fraction decomposition also arises in the integration of rational functions, since breaking up a rational function into smaller (linear) components leads to more tractable sub-integrals.

Example 1: Evaluate the sum ∑n=1501n2+n.\sum_{n=1}^{50}\frac{1}{n^2+n}.

Solution: Decomposing the fraction, we get:

∑n=1501n(n+1)=∑n=150(1n−1n+1).\begin{align} \sum_{n=1}^{50}\frac{1}{n(n+1)}=\sum_{n=1}^{50}\left(\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+1}\right). \end{align}

Summing, we get:

1−12+12−13+13−14+...+150−151.\begin{align} 1-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{4}+...+\frac{1}{50}-\frac{1}{51}. \end{align}

Now, with cancellation, we obtain:

1−151=∑n=1501n2+n=5051\begin{align} 1-\frac{1}{51}=\sum_{n=1}^{50}\frac{1}{n^2+n}=\boxed{\frac{50}{51}} \end{align}

You may be wondering how to find such a decomposition in general. See Partial Fraction Decomposition for more details on this.

Example 2: Evaluate the sum ∑k=1nk2(k−1)!.\sum_{k=1}^n k^2 (k-1)!.

Solution: Note that

k2(k−1)!=k k!=(k+1)k!−k!.\begin{align} k^2 (k-1)!= k \text{ } k!=(k+1) k!-k! . \end{align}

Therefore, our desired sum is:

∑k=1nk2(k−1)!=∑k=1n(k+1)!−∑k=1nk!.\begin{align} \sum_{k=1}^n k^2 (k-1)!= \sum_{k=1}^n (k+1)!-\sum_{k=1}^n k!. \end{align}

Most of the terms are common between the two sums, and therefore cancel out. The last term of the first sum and the first term of the second sum are the only surviving terms. Our answer is (n+1)!−1\boxed{(n+1)!-1}.

There are analogous problems for products as well. We'll present a trigonometric example that the reader is encouraged to generalize.

Example 3: Find cos⁡(π7)cos⁡(2π7)cos⁡(4π7)\cos(\frac{\pi}{7})\cos(\frac{2\pi}{7})\cos(\frac{4\pi}{7}).

Solution: First notice that the problem involves powers of 22, which seems especially interesting since 7=23−17=2^3-1. That suggests that a simplification technique such as double angle may succeed.

In order to apply the sine double angle relation sin⁡(2θ)=2sin⁡(θ)cos⁡(θ)\sin(2 \theta)=2 \sin(\theta)\cos(\theta), we need both sines and cosines. The problem seems to conveniently leave out any sines, but let's try to introduce them on both sides. Let the desired product be PP, and consider Psin⁡(π7)P \sin(\frac{\pi}{7}). Those who have played 2048 may recognize the idea. We have that

Psin⁡(π7)=sin⁡(π7)cos⁡(π7)cos⁡(2π7)cos⁡(4π7)=12⋅sin⁡(2π7)cos⁡(2π7)cos⁡(4π7)=12⋅12⋅sin⁡(4π7)cos⁡(4π7)=12⋅12⋅12⋅sin⁡(8π7)=−18sin⁡(π7),\begin{align} P\sin(\frac{\pi}{7})&=\sin(\frac{\pi}{7})\cos(\frac{\pi}{7})\cos(\frac{2\pi}{7})\cos(\frac{4\pi}{7}) \\\\ &=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\sin(\frac{2\pi}{7})\cos(\frac{2\pi}{7})\cos(\frac{4\pi}{7})\\\\ &=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{1}{2}\cdot\sin(\frac{4\pi}{7})\cos(\frac{4\pi}{7}) \\\\ &=\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{1}{2}\cdot\frac{1}{2}\cdot\sin(\frac{8\pi}{7}) \\\\ &=-\frac{1}{8}\sin(\frac{\pi}{7}), \end{align}

so the desired answer is −18\boxed{-\frac{1}{8}}.

Stretch your creativity

Contest problems rarely look like the examples you studied. Solving one means finding your own way in. These are real problems from the AMC 8, AMC 12 and AIME, the national math competitions for middle and high school students, each with a worked solution on LIVE by Po-Shen Loh.

Interactive · 1 question

Telescoping sums are series whose terms will stack together and cancel themselves out. Just like the telescopes that some pirates used, the telescopes that these sums were named after those telescopes you could stack together and stuff into your pocket very easily. In the same way, it's way easier to find the value of what's left of a telescoping sum after you collapse it than the entire telescope.

The best way to explain how to telescope a series and what series are telescopic is to show some examples.

Question: How would you telescope the sum 1+2−2+3−3+4−4+⋯+10−10+11?1+2-2+3-3+4-4+\cdots+10-10+11?

This becomes 1+(2−2)+(3−3)+(4−4)+⋯+(10−10)+11,1+(2-2)+(3-3)+(4-4)+\cdots+(10-10)+11, or 1+0+0+⋯+0+11=12!1+0+0+\cdots+0+11=12!

The ⋯+n−n+⋯\cdots+n-n+\cdots terms all cancel out, just leaving a 1+111+11.

Let's try a harder one! This is a very well-known telescoping series: 11⋅2+12⋅3+...+15⋅6\dfrac{1}{1\cdot2}+\dfrac{1}{2\cdot3}+...+\dfrac{1}{5\cdot6}

Choose one answer

Read · 3 min

####Practice Questions

Telescoping sums are sums wherein terms cancel out each other, leaving only a few terms. There are various techniques used to simplify telescoping sums. Let's look at some examples

Easy Examples

  1. Evaluate (1−2)+(2−3)+...+(2013−2014)(1-2)+(2-3)+...+(2013-2014)

Clearly one would realize that this is equivalent to (−1)∗2013=−2013(-1)*2013=\boxed{-2013}. However, if we think about this using telescoping sums, we realize that the -2 and 2 cancel out, then -3 and 3, and so on until the -2013 and 2013. The ones that we are left with are 1 and -2014, so the sum is 1−2014=−20131-2014=\boxed{-2013}.

Let's go to a bit more "challenging" one.

  1. Evaluate (1+2−3−4)+(2+3−4−5)+...+(97+98−99−100)(1+2-3-4)+(2+3-4-5)+...+(97+98-99-100).

If one wants to compute out each parenthesis (each is equal to k+(k+1)−(k+2)−(k+3)=−4k+(k+1)-(k+2)-(k+3)=-4, and note that there are 97 parentheses, the sum would be −4∗97=−388-4*97=\boxed{-388}.

However, we could think about this with telescoping sums!

It is easy to notice that there are 97 parentheses. Consider the 1st, 3rd, ..., 97th parenthesis. The 3 and the 4 in the first parenthesis cancels out with the 3 and the 4 in the second parenthesis. The 5 and the 6 in the second parenthesis cancels out with the 5 and 6 in the third parenthesis. We could continue doing this, until we are left with 1+2-99-100.

With regards to the "even-ordered" parentheses, we are left with 2+3-98-99.

Adding up, we get (1+2−99−100)+(2+3−98−99)=−196+(−192)=−388(1+2-99-100)+(2+3-98-99)=-196+(-192)=\boxed{-388}.

Sum of Reciprocals (or something close to it)

  1. Evaluate 1(1)(2)+1(2)(3)+...+1(9)(10)\frac{1}{(1)(2)}+\frac{1}{(2)(3)}+...+\frac{1}{(9)(10)}.

Since we are trying to make this a telescoping sum, we try to express each as the difference of two fractions.

We know that 1k−1k+1=1(k)(k+1)\frac{1}{k}-\frac{1}{k+1}=\frac{1}{(k)(k+1)}, so the sum is equal to (11−12)+(12−13)+...+(19−110)=11−110=910(\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{2})+(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{3})+...+(\frac{1}{9}-\frac{1}{10})=\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{10}=\boxed{\frac{9}{10}}.

With this, we could generalize this to 1(1)(2)+...+1(k)(k+1)=k(k+1)−1k(k+1)\frac{1}{(1)(2)}+...+\frac{1}{(k)(k+1)}=\boxed{\frac{k(k+1)-1}{k(k+1)}}.

Of course, the difference between the terms is not necessarily equal to 11.

For example, the following is true: 1k−1k+n=nk(k+n)\frac{1}{k}-\frac{1}{k+n}=\frac{n}{k(k+n)}. If the common differences are all equal, then we could still represent the sum as a telescoping sum, and then the terms will cancel out.

Clearly this method could be extended to products, with the numerators and denominators cancelling out. 2. Evaluate 1(3)(5)+1(5)(7)+...+1(97)(99)\frac{1}{(3)(5)}+\frac{1}{(5)(7)}+...+\frac{1}{(97)(99)}.

We could write the sum as (13−15)+(15−17)+...+(197−199)2=13−1992=96(3)(99)(2)=1699\frac{(\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{5})+(\frac{1}{5}-\frac{1}{7})+...+(\frac{1}{97}-\frac{1}{99})}{2}=\frac{\frac{1}{3}-\frac{1}{99}}{2}=\frac{96}{(3)(99)(2)}=\frac{16}{99}.

Trigonometric Applications

Trigonometric identities (usually the angle addition identity) would make telescoping sums easy. The double-angle identity would also help.

  1. Simplify 8cos⁡(π32)sin⁡(π32)sin⁡(π16)sin⁡(π8)8\cos(\frac{\pi}{32})\sin(\frac{\pi}{32})\sin(\frac{\pi}{16})\sin(\frac{\pi}{8})

Using the identity sin⁡2a=2sin⁡acos⁡a\sin 2a=2\sin a\cos a repeatedly, this is equal to

4cos⁡(π16)sin⁡(π16)sin⁡(π8)=2cos⁡(π8)sin⁡(π8)=sin⁡(π8)=224\cos(\frac{\pi}{16})\sin(\frac{\pi}{16})\sin(\frac{\pi}{8}) =2\cos(\frac{\pi}{8})\sin(\frac{\pi}{8}) =\sin(\frac{\pi}{8})=\boxed{\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}}.

  1. (USAMO 1992) Prove that 1cos⁡0∘cos⁡1∘+1cos⁡1∘cos⁡2∘+...+1cos⁡88∘cos⁡89∘=cos⁡1∘sin⁡21∘\frac{1}{\cos 0^{\circ}\cos 1^{\circ}}+\frac{1}{\cos 1^{\circ}\cos 2^{\circ}}+...+\frac{1}{\cos 88^{\circ}\cos 89^{\circ}}=\frac{\cos 1^{\circ}}{\sin^2 1^{\circ}}.

We move one of the occurrences of the sin⁡1∘\sin 1^{\circ} to the numerators, to get

sin⁡1∘cos⁡0∘cos⁡1∘+sin⁡1∘cos⁡1∘cos⁡2∘+...+sin⁡1∘cos⁡88∘cos⁡89∘=cos⁡1∘sin⁡1∘\frac{\sin 1^{\circ}}{\cos 0^{\circ}\cos 1^{\circ}}+\frac{\sin 1^{\circ}}{\cos 1^{\circ}\cos 2^{\circ}}+...+\frac{\sin 1^{\circ}}{\cos 88^{\circ}\cos 89^{\circ}}=\frac{\cos 1^{\circ}}{\sin 1^{\circ}}

Now we would want to see how is sin⁡1∘\sin 1^{\circ} relevant to cos⁡k∘\cos k^{\circ} and cos⁡(k+1)∘\cos (k+1)^{\circ}. We could use the difference identity, which is sin⁡(a−b)∘=sin⁡a∘cos⁡b∘−cos⁡a∘sin⁡b∘\sin (a-b)^{\circ}=\sin a^{\circ}\cos b^{\circ}-\cos a^{\circ}\sin b^{\circ}. Hence sin⁡1∘=sin⁡(k+1)∘cos⁡k∘−sin⁡k∘cos⁡(k+1)∘\sin 1^{\circ}=\sin (k+1)^{\circ}\cos k^{\circ}-\sin k^{\circ}\cos (k+1)^{\circ}.

Thus we can write each term as sin⁡(k+1)∘cos⁡k∘−cos⁡(k+1)∘sin⁡k∘cos⁡k∘cos⁡(k+1)∘=sin⁡(k+1)∘cos⁡(k+1)∘−sin⁡k∘cos⁡k∘\frac{\sin (k+1)^{\circ}\cos k^{\circ}-\cos (k+1)^{\circ}\sin k^{\circ}}{\cos k^{\circ}\cos (k+1)^{\circ}}=\frac{\sin (k+1)^{\circ}}{\cos (k+1)^{\circ}}-\frac{\sin k^{\circ}}{\cos k^{\circ}}.

Summing up all of these from k=0k=0 to k=88k=88 gives that the sum is sin⁡89∘cos⁡89∘−sin⁡0∘cos⁡0∘=cos⁡1∘sin⁡1∘\frac{\sin 89^{\circ}}{\cos 89^{\circ}}-\frac{\sin 0^{\circ}}{\cos 0^{\circ}}=\frac{\cos 1^{\circ}}{\sin 1^{\circ}}, which is exactly what we want to show!

Inequalities

  1. Show that 112+122+...1k2<2\frac{1}{1^2}+\frac{1}{2^2}+...\frac{1}{k^2}<2 for whatever kk.

  2. Find the greatest integer less than 11+12+...+110000\frac{1}{\sqrt{1}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}+...+\frac{1}{\sqrt{10000}}

Exercises

Roughly arranged in increasing order of difficulty.

  1. Simplify 1(1)(4)+1(4)(7)+...+1(2011)(2014)\frac{1}{(1)(4)}+\frac{1}{(4)(7)}+...+\frac{1}{(2011)(2014)}.

  2. (AHSME 1986) Simplify the product (1−122)(1−132)...(1−1102)(1-\frac{1}{2^2})(1-\frac{1}{3^2})...(1-\frac{1}{10^2}).

  3. Prove that the infinite product (1−122)(1−132)...(1-\frac{1}{2^2})(1-\frac{1}{3^2})... equals to 12\frac{1}{2}.

  4. (Putnam 1977) Evaluate the infinite product: (23−123+1)(33−133+1)...(\frac{2^3-1}{2^3+1})(\frac{3^3-1}{3^3+1})....

  5. (HMMT) Compute the infinite sum 132+1+142+1+152+3+...\frac{1}{3^2+1}+\frac{1}{4^2+1}+\frac{1}{5^2+3}+....

  6. Evaluate the sum ∑k=1n1(k+1)k−kk+1\sum^n_{k=1} \frac{1}{(k+1)\sqrt{k}-k\sqrt{k+1}}.

  7. Simplify sin⁡1∘+sin⁡2∘+...+sin⁡n∘\sin 1^{\circ}+\sin 2^{\circ}+...+\sin n^{\circ} in terms of cos⁡12\cos \frac{1}{2}, cos⁡(n+12)\cos (n+\frac{1}{2}), and 2sin⁡122\sin \frac{1}{2}.

  8. (Leningrad Mathematical Olympiad) Prove that for all positive integers nn, n−1<11+2+32+5+...+2n−1(n−1)2+1+n2+1<nn-1<\frac{1}{\sqrt{1}+\sqrt{2}}+\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{5}}+...+\frac{2n-1}{\sqrt{(n-1)^2+1}+\sqrt{n^2+1}}<n.

  9. (IMO 2012)* Let a2a_2, a3a_3, ..., ana_n be positive real numbers that satisfy a2⋅a3⋅...⋅an=1a_2 \cdot a_3 \cdot ... \cdot a_n=1. Prove that (a2+1)2⋅(a3+1)3⋅...⋅(an+1)n≥nn(a_2+1)^2 \cdot (a_3+1)^3 \cdot ... \cdot (a_n+1)^n \ge n^n.

  10. (IMO 2013)* Prove that for any pair of positive integers kk and nn, there exist kk positive integers m1m_1, m2m_2, ..., mkm_k (not necessarily different) such that 1+2k−1n=(1+1m1)(1+1m2)...(1+1mk)1+\frac{2^k-1}{n}=(1+\frac{1}{m_1})(1+\frac{1}{m_2})...(1+\frac{1}{m_k}).

  • Starred problem uses ideas other than telescoping sums, but the concept is the same.

Video

(Video) Telescoping Series

by patrickJMT

In this video, patrickJMT walks you through an example of finding the sum of a telescoping series, using partial fractions.

Illustrated · 1 min

Telescoping Sums and Products

A telescoping sum is a sum in which many of the terms cancel each other out. Instead of adding every term separately, you look for terms that appear with opposite signs. As the matching terms cancel, the expression becomes much shorter.

Usually, only the first and last few terms remain. This makes telescoping sums much easier to evaluate than they first appear.

Telescoping Sums
Only a few terms remain, making the expression easier to solve

Image source: by Anusha Rahman

For example,

(1−12)+(12−13)+(13−14)(1 - \frac12) + (\frac12 - \frac13) + (\frac13 - \frac14)

The 12\frac12 and −12-\frac12 cancel each other out. Similarly, the 13\frac13 and −13-\frac13 also cancel each other out. After the cancelations, you're left with:

1−141 - \frac14

Instead of adding six fractions, you only need to subtract the remaining term from the first.

####Telescoping Products

A telescoping product works similarly, but it uses multiplication instead of addition. Matching factors in the numerators and denominators cancel each other.

For example,

21⋅32⋅43⋅54\frac{2}{1} \cdot \frac{3}{2} \cdot \frac{4}{3} \cdot \frac{5}{4}

The 2s2s, 3s3s, and 4s4s will cancel each other out, leaving you with 51\frac{5}{1}, which equals 55.

Learning to recognize telescoping sums and products can save a great deal of work. Instead of performing many calculations, you can focus on the few terms that do not cancel. This makes telescoping expressions a useful tool for simplifying finite sums and products.

Like telescoping sums, Infinite Geometric Series as Rational Functions provide a way to rewrite an infinite sum as a simple closed-form expression. Both techniques transform a long series into a much simpler result.

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems