Illustrated · 1 min
Intuitive limiting argument
Sometimes we have a sort of "degenerate/tangent" inscribed angle, like below. It's a "degenerate tangent case" in the sense that the inscribed angle is formed by the secant and the tangent to the magenta circle (when the circle in question is clear, it can be helpful, at least intuitively, to call the tangent line "", and the inscribed angle "").
Do you have a guess for what might equal, in view of the blue, green, yellow, and orange lines (and the previous topic on "normal" inscribed-angle/intercepted-arc relationships)?
In the diagram, it looks like the sequence of inscribed angles "approaches the limiting degenerate/tangent inscribed angle ".
Similarly, it looks like the sequence of arcs "approaches the arc " (although this time we don't have any "degeneracy" or anything like that).
Based on the previously encountered "normal case", we have so might expect that is simply equal to .
This is indeed true, but in order to "formalize" the argument above, we need to use a basic tool/notion from calculus---that of limits and continuity. But don't worry about this---if you can understand the intuition, that's great.
Caveat with "lazy " notation
If we "approach from the other direction", then we need to be careful talking about "". In this new context we would mean , which is supplementary, so generally unequal, to .






