微分中值定理

Before this, know罗尔定理

Read · 3 min

Steven Kwon has written about the intuition and proof behind the MVT here.

But why do we need the Mean Value Theorem (MVT)?

Well, the MVT tells us that for any interval [a,b][a,b], we can find an interior point c∈(a,b)c\in (a,b) where the derivative/"sensitivity" f′(c)f'(c) "represents" the overall change of the function, in the sense that Δf=f(b)−f(a)\Delta{f} = f(b)-f(a) equals f′(c)Δx=f′(c)(b−a)f'(c)\Delta{x} = f'(c)(b-a).

So the rough answer is that if we have information about the derivative/"sensitivity" of a function at lots of points (e.g. on an interval [a,b][a,b]), then we can use the MVT to translate that into properties of the function itself. For example, in (1) below, we're given lots of "local" derivative information, e.g. that f′(x)>0f'(x) > 0 always (the derivative is always positive), and we can use MVT to translate that into a more "global" statement about increasing functions (i.e. f(a)<f(b)f(a) < f(b) whenever a<ba < b).

Well, the rough answer is that it allows us to use "local" derivative/"sensitivity" information to say interesting things about "global"/big-picture function properties. (The limit definition of a derivative already tells us how to use "global"/big-picture function information---namely the function values themselves---to say interesting things about "local" derivative/"sensitivity" properties.) In applications 1, 2, and 3 below, this is how the MVT is used. *

On the other hand, the MVT can seem kind of arbitrary (&), especially if you don't care so much about rigor. Is it really necessary to learn/teach?

Well, you can read the thread if you're interested. But for me, here's the key takeaway, stolen from Jeff Strom's excellent answer:

The MVT is the basis for all proofs that geometric intuition about slopes of tangent lines holds for the limit definition. That is, the metamathematical content of the MVT is that the intuition definition matches the formal definition.

In other words, the MVT is just a rigorous way to capture our geometric intuition about derivatives, which you use a lot in sketching derivatives. But again, don't worry if you find the MVT arbitrary. You'll be fine if you understand the intuition for some of its most important applications:

(1) Increasing and decreasing (monotone) functions in terms of derivatives.

(2) Functions with always-zero derivatives (this is later applied to answer the very important question of whether anti-derivatives are unique, but don't worry if you haven't heard of anti-derivatives yet).

(3) When tangents lie above or below graphs.

In all of these, we have some intuition involving some sort of inequality (&&) in a function or graph: the notion of increasing/decreasing in (1), a graph "resembling a horizontal line everywhere" in (2), and the notion of above/below in (3). And in each case, the MVT is just a simple way to formalize our graphical intuition.

(4) Precursor to Taylor's "Weak" Theorem *

Additional comments (feel free to ignore these)

(&) The reason MVT seems arbitrary is because it just says there exists some point cc with f′(c)=f(b)−f(a)b−af'(c) = \frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}, while it would possibly be more natural to have a statement like "the average value of the derivative is f(b)−f(a)b−a\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}". And it turns out that this is true, in some sense (it's half of the fundamental theorem of calculus, which you'll encounter later on). The caveat? To prove that, we use (2) from above, which comes from MVT.

(&&) More precisely, it's worth clarifying why MVT works to prove these inequalities, because (&) makes MVT seem kind of unnatural or artificial. Roughly speaking, the reason MVT works for 1, 2, and 3 is that the information on derivatives we have in these cases is uniform:

(1) We're using MVT on a function with f′(x)>0f'(x) > 0 for all xx.

(2) We're using MVT on a function with f′(x)=0f'(x) = 0 for all xx.

(3) We're using MVT on a function with f′′(x)>0f''(x) > 0 for all xx.

Interactive · 2 questions

In the previous section, we talked about Rolle's theorem, which stated that given a function f(x)f(x) continuous on [a,b)[a,b) and differentiable on (a,b)(a,b), if f(a)=f(b)f(a)=f(b) there exists a cc in (a,b)(a,b) such that f′(c)=0f'(c)=0. Now, what if f(a)≠f(b)f(a)\ne f(b)? Can a similar case hold?

Thankfully, the answer is yes, and this leads us to the Mean Value Theorem for derivatives. (We specify that this is for derivatives, because there is also a Mean Value Theorem for integrals, which you will see later.)

Before we tell you the theorem, let's see if we can figure it out together: consider the function f(x)=x2f(x)=x^2 on the interval [0,1][0,1], as shown below:

Any suggestions on what to do next?

Choose one answer

Read · 1 min

Here is a worksheet to practice your newly learned skill: applying the Generalized Rolle's Theorem (a.k.a Mean Value Theorem). Good luck! P.S. Answers are on the bottom.

Video · + 1 min read

(Video) The Mean Value Theorem

by PatrickJMT

Here's a video by patrickJMT explaining the Mean Value Theorem and how it is used.

The Mean Value Theorem states that some function, f(x)f(x), is

  1. Continuous on [a,b][a,b]
  2. Differentiable on (a,b)(a,b)

then there exists at least one point, cc, in (a,b)(a,b) such that f′(c)=f(b)−f(a)b−af'(c)=\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}

Graphic Representation

Suppose we have some function on the interval (a,b)(a,b) that's continuous and differentiable.

Now we take a line that connects point aa to point bb.

This line is the slope between the two points and can be written as: m=f(b)−f(a)b−am=\frac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}

We see that there are places on this graph where the slope of the derivative at that point is equal to this line through the middle.

The Mean Value Theorem tells us there will be at least one point whose derivative is equal to the slope of the endpoints. In this example we have two: c1c_1 and c2c_2. f′(c1)=mf′(c2)=mf'(c_1)=m\\ f'(c_2)=m

Let's try a problem involving the Mean Value Theorem.

For f(x)=1+x−13f(x)=1+\sqrt[3]{x-1} on the interval [2,9][2,9], find all cc in [2,9][2,9] such that: f′(c)=f(9)−f(2)9−2f'(c)=\frac{f(9)-f(2)}{9-2}

We first need to show that the function is continuous and differentiable on this domain. There's actually a theorem that states root functions are continuous on their domains.

To find where a function is differentiable you just find the domain of its derivative. f(x)=1+x−13f′(x)=13(x−1)−23f′(x)=13(x−1)23\begin{align} f(x)&=1+\sqrt[3]{x-1}\\ f'(x)&=\frac{1}{3}(x-1)^{-\frac23}\\ f'(x)&=\frac{1}{3(x-1)^{\frac23}} \end{align} The derivative is undefined where the denominator equals zero. 3(x−1)23=0x−1=0x=1\begin{align} 3(x-1)^{\frac23}&=0\\ x-1&=0\\ x&=1 \end{align} So the derivative is undefined at x=1x=1. Since our interval doesn't contain this point we know our function is differentiable within the domain.

Since our function is continuous and differentiable on this domain, we can use the Mean Value Theorem. f′(c)=f(9)−f(2)9−213(c−1)23=[1+9−13]−[1+2−13]713(c−1)23=3−2713(c−1)23=173(c−1)23=7(c−1)23=73c−1=(73)32c=1±(73)3\begin{align} f'(c)&=\frac{f(9)-f(2)}{9-2}\\ \frac{1}{3(c-1)^{\frac23}}&=\frac{[1+\sqrt[3]{9-1}]-[1+\sqrt[3]{2-1}]}{7}\\ \frac{1}{3(c-1)^{\frac23}}&=\frac{3-2}{7}\\ \frac{1}{3(c-1)^{\frac23}}&=\frac{1}{7}\\ 3(c-1)^{\frac23}&=7\\ (c-1)^{\frac23}&=\frac73\\ c-1&=\bigg(\frac73\bigg)^{\frac32}\\ c&=1\pm\sqrt{\bigg(\frac73\bigg)^3} \end{align}

The only one that's within our interval is: c=1+(73)3c=1+\sqrt{\bigg(\frac73\bigg)^3} This is the point where the derivative equals the slope of the endpoints.

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems