Interactive · 1 question

Ceva's Theorem has multiple forms. One form is the standard one with a product of ratios of lengths equaling one. However, there is another lesser-known form as well: the trigonometric form! It is not hard to derive from the traditional Ceva's Theorem, and in this post we will do so.

Here, we have concurrent cevians ADAD, BEBE, and CFCF intersecting at a point PP inside the triangle. By Ceva's Theorem, we know that AFFB⋅BDDC⋅CEEA=1.\dfrac{AF}{FB}\cdot\dfrac{BD}{DC}\cdot\dfrac{CE}{EA}=1. How can we rewrite this in a different form? Think about it for a while before continuing.

We do this with something called the Ratio Lemma, which states that for a cevian ADAD in △ABC\triangle ABC, BDDC=ABsin⁡∠BADACsin⁡∠CAD.\dfrac{BD}{DC}=\dfrac{AB\sin\angle BAD}{AC\sin\angle CAD}. A discussion of greater detail is/will soon be posted here.

This is the perfect expression for achieving what we want, because it gives us the exact ratio BD:DCBD:DC and in addition contains trigonometry! Unfortunately, those pesky side lengths ABAB and ACAC seem to get in the way of making a nice and beautiful formula. But do they actually?

Choose one answer

Illustrated · 1 min

I recently came across with this post an hour ago. Here I would like to share my own method in proving the Trigonometric Ceva theorem. Let me start with a lemma.

Lemma: Let ABCABC be a triangle, and let PP be a varaible inside ABCABC. Let B1B_1, B2B_2 be varaible point on segment ACAC let circumcircles AB1PAB_1P and AB2PAB_2P intersect ABAB at C1C_1 and C2C_2 respectively. Then B1B2C1C2=sin⁡∠PACsin⁡∠PAB\displaystyle \frac{B_1B_2}{C_1C_2}=\frac{\sin \angle PAC}{\sin \angle PAB}.

Proof of Lemma: The obvious move is by using sine rule. Without loss of generality, B1B_1 lies betwwen AA and B2B_2, then we have C2C_2 lies between AA and C1C_1. We have sin⁡∠PACsin⁡∠PAB=B2Psin⁡∠PB2AAP⋅APC2Psin⁡∠PC2A=B2Psin⁡∠PB2AC2Psin⁡∠PC2A=B2Psin⁡∠PC2C1C2Psin⁡∠PB1B2=B1B2sin⁡∠C2PC1C1C2sin⁡∠B2PB1\displaystyle \frac{\sin \angle PAC}{\sin \angle PAB}=\frac{B_2P\sin \angle PB_2A}{AP}\cdot \frac{AP}{C_2P\sin \angle PC_2A}=\frac{B_2P\sin \angle PB_2A}{C_2P\sin \angle PC_2A}=\frac{B_2P\sin \angle PC_2C_1}{C_2P\sin \angle PB_1B_2}=\frac{B_1B_2\sin \angle C_2PC_1}{C_1C_2\sin \angle B_2PB_1}. Let us prove that in fact ∠B2PB1=∠C2PC1\angle B_2PB_1=\angle C_2PC_1.

∠B2PB1=∠APB2−∠APB1=∠AC2B2−∠AC1B1=180−∠TC2C1−∠C2C1T=∠C2TC1=∠B1TB2\angle B_2PB_1=\angle APB_2-\angle APB_1=\angle AC_2B_2-\angle AC_1B_1=180-\angle TC_2C_1-\angle C_2C_1T=\angle C_2TC_1=\angle B_1TB_2. We get B2,B1,T,PB_2, B_1, T, P concyclic. Similarly, C2,C1,T,PC_2, C_1, T, P concyclic. So ∠B2PB1=∠B1TB2=∠C2TC1=∠C2PC1\angle B_2PB_1=\angle B_1TB_2=\angle C_2TC_1=\angle C_2PC_1. The lemma is proved.

Let us proceed to the main theorem.

Proof of the theorem: Construct similar points A1A_1 and A2A_2 on BCBC so that B1PA1CB_1PA_1C and B2PA2CB_2PA_2C are cyclic. Then by Miquel's theorem, CC1PA1CC_1PA_1 and CC2PA2CC_2PA_2 are also cyclic. So, by the lemma, we get sin⁡∠PACsin⁡∠PAB⋅sin⁡∠PBAsin⁡∠PBC⋅sin⁡∠PCBsin⁡∠PCA=B1B2C1C2⋅C1C2A1A2⋅A1A2B1B2=1\frac{\sin \angle PAC}{\sin \angle PAB}\cdot \frac{\sin \angle PBA}{\sin \angle PBC}\cdot \frac{\sin \angle PCB}{\sin \angle PCA}=\frac{B_1B_2}{C_1C_2} \cdot \frac{C_1C_2}{A_1A_2} \cdot \frac{A_1A_2}{B_1B_2}=1

as required. Q.E.D.

Hope you like the proof :)

Read · 1 min

Problem. (ISL 2001 G1.) Let A1A_1 be the center of the square inscribed in acute triangle ABCABC with two vertices of the square on side BCBC. Thus one of the two remaining vertices of the square is on side ABAB and the other is on ACAC. Points B1, C1B_1,\ C_1 are defined in a similar way for inscribed squares with two vertices on sides ACAC and ABAB, respectively. Prove that lines AA1, BB1, CC1AA_1,\ BB_1,\ CC_1 are concurrent.

Let  ~ □KLMN\square{KLMN}  ~ be the square with center  ~ A1A_1  ~ such that  ~ K∈AB‾  ∧  N∈AC‾K \in \overline{AB}\; \wedge\; N \in \overline{AC}  ~.

 ~ A1A_1  ~ is the center of  ~ □KLMN  ⟹  A1K‾=A1N‾  ∧  ∠A1KN=45∘=∠A1NK⋯ (1)\square{KLMN}\; \Longrightarrow\; \boxed{ \overline{A_1K} = \overline{A_1N} }\; \wedge\; \boxed{ \angle{A_1KN} = 45^\circ = \angle{A_1NK} }\quad \cdots\, (1)

□KLMN\square{KLMN}  ~ is a square  ~ ⟹  KN∥LM  ⟹  KN∥BC  ⇓\Longrightarrow\; KN \parallel LM\; \Longrightarrow\; KN \parallel BC\; \Downarrow

⟹  ∠AKN=∠ABC=∠B  ∧  ∠ANK=∠ACB=∠C⋯ (2)\Longrightarrow\; \boxed{ \angle{AKN} = \angle{ABC} = \angle{B} }\; \wedge\; \boxed{ \angle{ANK} = \angle{ACB} = \angle{C} }\quad \cdots\, (2)

In  ~ △AKA1  ∧  △ANA1  ⇓Law of sines\triangle{AKA_1}\; \wedge\; \triangle{ANA_1}\; \stackrel{ \text{Law of sines} }{\Downarrow}

⟹  sin⁡∠KAA1sin⁡∠A1KA=A1K‾A1A‾=(1)A1N‾A1A‾=sin⁡∠NAA1sin⁡∠A1NA  ⇓\Longrightarrow\; \frac { \sin \angle{KAA_1} } { \sin \angle{A_1KA} } = \frac { \overline{A_1K} } { \overline{A_1A} } \stackrel { (1) } {=} \frac { \overline{A_1N} } { \overline{A_1A} } = \frac { \sin \angle{NAA_1} } { \sin \angle{A_1NA} }\; \Downarrow

⟹  sin⁡∠KAA1sin⁡∠NAA1=sin⁡∠A1KAsin⁡∠A1NA=(1)  ∧  (2)sin⁡∠B+45∘sin⁡∠C+45∘  ⇓\Longrightarrow\; \frac { \sin \angle{KAA_1} } { \sin \angle{NAA_1} } = \frac { \sin \angle{A_1KA} } { \sin \angle{A_1NA} } \stackrel { (1)\; \wedge\; (2) } {=} \frac { \sin \angle{ B + 45^\circ } } { \sin \angle{ C + 45^\circ } }\; \Downarrow

⟹  sin⁡∠BAA1sin⁡∠CAA1=sin⁡∠B+45∘sin⁡∠C+45∘⋯ (3)\Longrightarrow\; \boxed{ \frac { \sin \angle{BAA_1} } { \sin \angle{CAA_1} } = \frac { \sin \angle{ B + 45^\circ } } { \sin \angle{ C + 45^\circ } } }\quad \cdots\, (3)

Similarly  ~ sin⁡∠CBB1sin⁡∠ABB1=sin⁡∠C+45∘sin⁡∠A+45∘  ∧  sin⁡∠ACC1sin⁡∠BCC1=sin⁡∠A+45∘sin⁡∠B+45∘⋯ (4)\boxed{ \frac { \sin \angle{CBB_1} } { \sin \angle{ABB_1} } = \frac { \sin \angle{ C + 45^\circ } } { \sin \angle{ A + 45^\circ } } }\; \wedge\; \boxed{ \frac { \sin \angle{ACC_1} } { \sin \angle{BCC_1} } = \frac { \sin \angle{ A + 45^\circ } } { \sin \angle{ B + 45^\circ } } }\quad \cdots\, (4)

⟹(3)  ∧  (4)  sin⁡∠BAA1sin⁡∠CAA1⋅sin⁡∠ACC1sin⁡∠BCC1⋅sin⁡∠CBB1sin⁡∠ABB1=\stackrel { (3)\; \wedge\; (4) } { \Longrightarrow }\; \boxed { \frac { \sin \angle{BAA_1} } { \sin \angle{CAA_1} } \cdot \frac { \sin \angle{ACC_1} } { \sin \angle{BCC_1} } \cdot \frac { \sin \angle{CBB_1} } { \sin \angle{ABB_1} } = }

=sin⁡∠B+45∘sin⁡∠C+45∘⋅sin⁡∠A+45∘sin⁡∠B+45∘⋅sin⁡∠C+45∘sin⁡∠A+45∘== \frac { \sin \angle{ B + 45^\circ } } { \sin \angle{ C + 45^\circ } } \cdot \frac { \sin \angle{ A + 45^\circ } } { \sin \angle{ B + 45^\circ } } \cdot \frac { \sin \angle{ C + 45^\circ } } { \sin \angle{ A + 45^\circ } } =

=1  ⇓trigonometric form of Ceva’s Theorem\boxed{ = 1 } \; \stackrel { \text{trigonometric form of Ceva's Theorem} } { \Downarrow}

Lines  ~ AA1, BB1  ∧  CC1AA_1,\, BB_1\; \wedge\; CC_1 are concurrent.  ~ ■\blacksquare

−- Solution by AoPS user Max D.R.

Type a concept, like “slope” or “photosynthesis”.

↑ ↓ to choose · Enter to openSearch explanations and problems