Illustrated · 1 min
Given a triangle , and a line that crosses , and at points , and respectively, with , , and distinct from , and , then
Proof: What does ratio cries for? Similar triangles!! So let us do some ''ratio chase''.
Important note: There are different cases to deal with, proving only one of them is not complete. Line may or may not intersect the triangle . First, the sign of the left-hand side will be always negative since either all three of the ratios are NEGATIVE, the case where the line do not intersect the triangle or exactly ONE is NEGATIVE and the other TWO are POSITIVE, the case where line crosses TWO sides of the triangle. So to prove both cases, we just need prove the product of magnitudes is .
Case 1: Line DEF intersect the triangle ABC.
Case 2: Line DEF do not intersect the triangle ABC.
Construct perpendiculars from , , and to the line and let their lengths be , , and respectively. Then , , and , which we get , and we are done. Q.E.D
Here are some problems to pratise with:
-
Let be a convex quadrilateral such that rays and intersect at , and rays and intersect at . Prove that midpoints of , , are colinear. (This is also known as the Newton's line.)
-
Prove the Desargues' theorem. Let and be two triangles. Then points , and are colinear if and only if lines , , are concurrent.
This is a strong theorem when dealing with ratios. So try to use it in your future Geometry problems!